A comprehensive analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of pulsed electric fields during soil electrokinetic remediation

Abstract Soil electrokinetic remediation (SEKR) is considered an effective method for removing pollutants by integrating chemical, physical, and biological treatments. It has multiple applications in fields such as dewatering, consolidation, sedimentation, seed germination, etc. This work builds upon a series of recent publications on SEKR, covering topics like electrode approaches, reverse polarity-based SEK, SEK design modifications, installation of perforated materials, and chemical-based SEK. This review focuses on the role of pulsed electric field (PEF) in enhancing the performance of SEKR. There are several other names for the PEF, including periodic, interval, “ON” and “OFF”, intermittent, and breaking electric fields. PEF is proposed as a solution to overcome certain obstacles in SEKR. The review evaluates PEF's impact on (a) remediating organic and inorganic hazards, anions, and salt, (b) integrating with other processes (reverse polarity, phytoremediation, and bioremediation), and (c) electro-dewatering and consolidation. PEF offers several advantages, such as reducing energy consumption, converting the residual fractions into weakly bound fractions, achieving satisfactory remediation, avoiding the voltage drop in the area across the cation exchange membrane, enhancing desorption and/or migration of charged species, permits the exchange of contaminant from solid to the liquid phase (interstitial fluid), allows contaminant diffusion through the soil pores during the off time, generate high electroosmotic flow, avoiding electrode corrosion, decreasing concentration polarization, etc. However, it may also prolong the remediation period and cause contaminant diffusion through the soil pores, which are considered obstacles for SEKR. This review also describe different techniques related to PEF and highlights the potential use of solar cells as a renewable energy source for SEKR. Graphic abstract

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology
Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-024-05996-9
Citations
19
Primary Topic
Electrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comprehensive analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of pulsed electric fields during soil electrokinetic remediation

Heba El-Araby, Ahmed Abou-Shady
19 citations
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology
Electrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques
3.96
article

A comprehensive analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of pulsed electric fields during soil electrokinetic remediation

Heba El-Araby, Ahmed Abou-Shady
article en
19 citations

Abstract

Abstract Soil electrokinetic remediation (SEKR) is considered an effective method for removing pollutants by integrating chemical, physical, and biological treatments. It has multiple applications in fields such as dewatering, consolidation, sedimentation, seed germination, etc. This work builds upon a series of recent publications on SEKR, covering topics like electrode approaches, reverse polarity-based SEK, SEK design modifications, installation of perforated materials, and chemical-based SEK. This review focuses on the role of pulsed electric field (PEF) in enhancing the performance of SEKR. There are several other names for the PEF, including periodic, interval, “ON” and “OFF”, intermittent, and breaking electric fields. PEF is proposed as a solution to overcome certain obstacles in SEKR. The review evaluates PEF's impact on (a) remediating organic and inorganic hazards, anions, and salt, (b) integrating with other processes (reverse polarity, phytoremediation, and bioremediation), and (c) electro-dewatering and consolidation. PEF offers several advantages, such as reducing energy consumption, converting the residual fractions into weakly bound fractions, achieving satisfactory remediation, avoiding the voltage drop in the area across the cation exchange membrane, enhancing desorption and/or migration of charged species, permits the exchange of contaminant from solid to the liquid phase (interstitial fluid), allows contaminant diffusion through the soil pores during the off time, generate high electroosmotic flow, avoiding electrode corrosion, decreasing concentration polarization, etc. However, it may also prolong the remediation period and cause contaminant diffusion through the soil pores, which are considered obstacles for SEKR. This review also describe different techniques related to PEF and highlights the potential use of solar cells as a renewable energy source for SEKR. Graphic abstract

International Journal of Environmental Science and TechnologyVol. 22(5)
Kafrelsheikh University (EG), Desert Research Center (EG)
Science and Technology Development Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Electrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques
3.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.