Impact of dispensing optical, nonoptical, and electronic devices on the visual function of students attending the schools for the blind

Background: Many students attending schools for the blind have some vision that can be made use of to improve their vision function. Aims: Our study aimed to assess the impact of optical, nonoptical, and electronic devices on vision function of visually impaired students. Setting and Design: This prospective interventional study was conucted in schools for the blind in western Maharashtra, India. Methods: Students attending schools for the blind were evaluated with history-taking, visual acuity tests, ocular examinations, fundoscopy, and low vision workup in 2022–2023. The LV Prasad Functional Vision Questionnaire assessed impact on vision function, before and after 3-month adaptation period. Results: Five hundred and thirty-five students aged 5–25 years with visual acuity <6/60 in the better eye from eight schools were evaluated. Among them, 172 (31.77%) received low vision aids, with 144 (84.70%) using nonoptical devices such as NoIR filters, Caps, Typo scopes, and White canes. Optical devices such as telescopes and magnifiers in 35 and electronic devices like portable video magnifier in 11 students. Forty-six received all three types. There was a significant enhancement ( P < 0.001) in tasks related to distance, near vision, mobility, and outdoor lighting conditions for students using nonoptical devices alone or combined with optical aids and video magnifiers. Among the 119 (70%) students using nonoptical devices, 80 (67.22%) exclusively used them, while 42 (32.77%) combined them with other aids, showing even more substantial improvement. Conclusion: Optical, nonoptical and electronic, when used together improved vision function of visually impaired students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology and Research
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/jcor.jcor_62_24
Primary Topic
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of dispensing optical, nonoptical, and electronic devices on the visual function of students attending the schools for the blind

Amit Shinde, C. Deepika, Parikshit Gogate, Hardeep Kaur et al.
Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology and Research
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
article

Impact of dispensing optical, nonoptical, and electronic devices on the visual function of students attending the schools for the blind

Amit Shinde, C. Deepika, Parikshit Gogate, Hardeep Kaur, Supriya Phadke, Sharad Telap, Apoorva Shitole
article en

Abstract

Background: Many students attending schools for the blind have some vision that can be made use of to improve their vision function. Aims: Our study aimed to assess the impact of optical, nonoptical, and electronic devices on vision function of visually impaired students. Setting and Design: This prospective interventional study was conucted in schools for the blind in western Maharashtra, India. Methods: Students attending schools for the blind were evaluated with history-taking, visual acuity tests, ocular examinations, fundoscopy, and low vision workup in 2022–2023. The LV Prasad Functional Vision Questionnaire assessed impact on vision function, before and after 3-month adaptation period. Results: Five hundred and thirty-five students aged 5–25 years with visual acuity <6/60 in the better eye from eight schools were evaluated. Among them, 172 (31.77%) received low vision aids, with 144 (84.70%) using nonoptical devices such as NoIR filters, Caps, Typo scopes, and White canes. Optical devices such as telescopes and magnifiers in 35 and electronic devices like portable video magnifier in 11 students. Forty-six received all three types. There was a significant enhancement ( P < 0.001) in tasks related to distance, near vision, mobility, and outdoor lighting conditions for students using nonoptical devices alone or combined with optical aids and video magnifiers. Among the 119 (70%) students using nonoptical devices, 80 (67.22%) exclusively used them, while 42 (32.77%) combined them with other aids, showing even more substantial improvement. Conclusion: Optical, nonoptical and electronic, when used together improved vision function of visually impaired students.

Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology and ResearchVol. 12(3)
Queen's University Belfast (GB), Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre (IN), Community Eye Care Foundation (IN), Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.