Significant Differences in Microbial Soil Properties, Stoichiometry and Tree Growth Occurred within 15 Years after Afforestation on Different Parent Material

The mineralogical composition of the parent material, together with plant species and soil microorganisms, constitutes the foundational components of an ecosystem's energy cycle. Afforestation in arid-semi arid regions plays a crucial role in preventing erosion and enhancing soil quality, offering significant economic and ecological benefits. This study evaluated the effects of afforestation and different parent materials on the physicochemical and microbiological properties of soils, including microbial basal respiration (MR), as well as how these changes in soil properties after 15 years influence plant growth. For this purpose, various soil physicochemical parameters, MR, soil microbial biomass carbon (C<sub>mic</sub>), stoichiometry (microbial quotient = C<sub>mic</sub>/C<sub>org</sub> = <i>q</i>Mic and metabolic quotient = MR/C<sub>mic</sub> = <i>q</i>CO<sub>2</sub>), and tree growth metrics such as height and diameter were measured. The results indicated that when the physicochemical and microbiological properties of soils from different bedrock types, along with the average values of tree growth parameters, were analyzed, afforestation areas with limestone bedrock performed better than those with andesite bedrock. Notably, sensitive microbial properties, such as C<sub>mic</sub>, MR, and <i>q</i>Mic, were positively influenced by afforestation. The highest values of C<sub>mic</sub> (323 μg C g<sup>-1</sup>) and MR (1.3 CO<sub>2</sub>-C g<sup>-1</sup> h<sup>-1</sup>) were recorded in soils derived from limestone. In contrast, the highest <i>q</i>CO<sub>2</sub> was observed in the control plots of soils with andesite parent material (7.14). Considering all the measured soil properties, the samples can be ranked in the following order: limestone sample (LS) > andesite sample (AS) > limestone control (LC) > andesite control (AC). Similarly, considering measured plant growth parameters were ranked as LS > AS. As a result, the higher plant growth capacity and carbon retention of limestone soil indicate that it has high microbial biomass and microbial activity. This study emphasizes the importance of selecting suitable parent material and understanding soil properties to optimize future afforestation efforts on bare lands.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Life
Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/life14091139
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Significant Differences in Microbial Soil Properties, Stoichiometry and Tree Growth Occurred within 15 Years after Afforestation on Different Parent Material

Emre Babür
5 citations
Life
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
1.67
article

Significant Differences in Microbial Soil Properties, Stoichiometry and Tree Growth Occurred within 15 Years after Afforestation on Different Parent Material

Emre Babür
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The mineralogical composition of the parent material, together with plant species and soil microorganisms, constitutes the foundational components of an ecosystem's energy cycle. Afforestation in arid-semi arid regions plays a crucial role in preventing erosion and enhancing soil quality, offering significant economic and ecological benefits. This study evaluated the effects of afforestation and different parent materials on the physicochemical and microbiological properties of soils, including microbial basal respiration (MR), as well as how these changes in soil properties after 15 years influence plant growth. For this purpose, various soil physicochemical parameters, MR, soil microbial biomass carbon (C<sub>mic</sub>), stoichiometry (microbial quotient = C<sub>mic</sub>/C<sub>org</sub> = <i>q</i>Mic and metabolic quotient = MR/C<sub>mic</sub> = <i>q</i>CO<sub>2</sub>), and tree growth metrics such as height and diameter were measured. The results indicated that when the physicochemical and microbiological properties of soils from different bedrock types, along with the average values of tree growth parameters, were analyzed, afforestation areas with limestone bedrock performed better than those with andesite bedrock. Notably, sensitive microbial properties, such as C<sub>mic</sub>, MR, and <i>q</i>Mic, were positively influenced by afforestation. The highest values of C<sub>mic</sub> (323 μg C g<sup>-1</sup>) and MR (1.3 CO<sub>2</sub>-C g<sup>-1</sup> h<sup>-1</sup>) were recorded in soils derived from limestone. In contrast, the highest <i>q</i>CO<sub>2</sub> was observed in the control plots of soils with andesite parent material (7.14). Considering all the measured soil properties, the samples can be ranked in the following order: limestone sample (LS) > andesite sample (AS) > limestone control (LC) > andesite control (AC). Similarly, considering measured plant growth parameters were ranked as LS > AS. As a result, the higher plant growth capacity and carbon retention of limestone soil indicate that it has high microbial biomass and microbial activity. This study emphasizes the importance of selecting suitable parent material and understanding soil properties to optimize future afforestation efforts on bare lands.

LifeVol. 14(9)
Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University (TR)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
1.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.