A Framework for Quality Control in Quantitative Proteomics

A thorough evaluation of the quality, reproducibility, and variability of bottom-up proteomics data is necessary at every stage of a workflow, from planning to analysis. We share vignettes applying adaptable quality control (QC) measures to assess sample preparation, system function, and quantitative analysis. System suitability samples are repeatedly measured longitudinally with targeted methods, and we share examples where they are used on three instrument platforms to identify severe system failures and track function over months to years. Internal QCs incorporated at the protein and peptide levels allow our team to assess sample preparation issues and to differentiate system failures from sample-specific issues. External QC samples prepared alongside our experimental samples are used to verify the consistency and quantitative potential of our results during batch correction and normalization before assessing biological phenotypes. We combine these controls with rapid analysis (Skyline), longitudinal QC metrics (AutoQC), and server-based data deposition (PanoramaWeb). We propose that this integrated approach to QC is a useful starting point for groups to facilitate rapid quality control assessment to ensure that valuable instrument time is used to collect the best quality data possible. Data are available on Panorama Public and ProteomeXchange under the identifier PXD051318.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Proteome Research
Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00363
Citations
24
Primary Topic
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Framework for Quality Control in Quantitative Proteomics

Deanna L. Plubell, Kristine A. Tsantilas, Gennifer E. Merrihew, Michael S. Bereman et al.
24 citations
Journal of Proteome Research
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
5.78
article

A Framework for Quality Control in Quantitative Proteomics

Deanna L. Plubell, Kristine A. Tsantilas, Gennifer E. Merrihew, Michael S. Bereman, Jea Park, Jesse D. Canterbury, Eric Huang, Andrew N. Hoofnagle, Brendan MacLean, Josh Eckels, Sandra E. Spencer Miko, Michael J. MacCoss, Michael Riffle, Richard S. Johnson, Julia Robbins, Vagisha Sharma, Christine Wu
article en
24 citations

Abstract

A thorough evaluation of the quality, reproducibility, and variability of bottom-up proteomics data is necessary at every stage of a workflow, from planning to analysis. We share vignettes applying adaptable quality control (QC) measures to assess sample preparation, system function, and quantitative analysis. System suitability samples are repeatedly measured longitudinally with targeted methods, and we share examples where they are used on three instrument platforms to identify severe system failures and track function over months to years. Internal QCs incorporated at the protein and peptide levels allow our team to assess sample preparation issues and to differentiate system failures from sample-specific issues. External QC samples prepared alongside our experimental samples are used to verify the consistency and quantitative potential of our results during batch correction and normalization before assessing biological phenotypes. We combine these controls with rapid analysis (Skyline), longitudinal QC metrics (AutoQC), and server-based data deposition (PanoramaWeb). We propose that this integrated approach to QC is a useful starting point for groups to facilitate rapid quality control assessment to ensure that valuable instrument time is used to collect the best quality data possible. Data are available on Panorama Public and ProteomeXchange under the identifier PXD051318.

Journal of Proteome ResearchVol. 23(10)
North Carolina State University (US), University of British Columbia (CA), University of Washington (US), Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre (CA), Thermo Fisher Scientific (United States) (US)
University of Washington, National Institutes of Health, Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity, National Institute on Aging, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, Army Research Office
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
5.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.