Selection of number of clusters and warping penalty in clustering functional electrocardiogram

Clustering functional data aims to identify unique functional patterns in the entire domain, but this can be challenging due to phase variability that distorts the observed patterns. Curve registration can be used to remove this variability, but determining the appropriate level of warping flexibility can be complicated. Curve registration also requires a target to which a functional object is aligned, typically the cross-sectional mean of functional objects within the same cluster. However, this mean is unknown prior to clustering. Furthermore, there is a trade-off between flexible warping and the number of resulting clusters. Removing more phase variability through curve registration can lead to fewer remaining variations in the functional data, resulting in a smaller number of clusters. Thus, the optimal number of clusters and warping flexibility cannot be uniquely identified. We propose to use external information to solve the identification issue. We define a cross validated Kullback-Leibler information criterion to select the number of clusters and the warping penalty. The criterion is derived from the predictive classification likelihood considering the joint distribution of both the functional data and external variable and penalizes the uncertainty in the cluster membership. We evaluate our method through simulation and apply it to electrocardiographic data collected in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort study. We identify two distinct clusters of electrocardiogram (ECG) profiles, with the second cluster exhibiting ST segment depression, an indication of cardiac ischemia, compared to the normal ECG profiles in the first cluster.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistics in Medicine
Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.10192
Primary Topic
Advanced Clustering Algorithms Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Selection of number of clusters and warping penalty in clustering functional electrocardiogram

Wensheng Guo, Wei Peter Yang, Harold I. Feldman
Statistics in Medicine
Advanced Clustering Algorithms Research
article

Selection of number of clusters and warping penalty in clustering functional electrocardiogram

Wensheng Guo, Wei Peter Yang, Harold I. Feldman
article en

Abstract

Clustering functional data aims to identify unique functional patterns in the entire domain, but this can be challenging due to phase variability that distorts the observed patterns. Curve registration can be used to remove this variability, but determining the appropriate level of warping flexibility can be complicated. Curve registration also requires a target to which a functional object is aligned, typically the cross-sectional mean of functional objects within the same cluster. However, this mean is unknown prior to clustering. Furthermore, there is a trade-off between flexible warping and the number of resulting clusters. Removing more phase variability through curve registration can lead to fewer remaining variations in the functional data, resulting in a smaller number of clusters. Thus, the optimal number of clusters and warping flexibility cannot be uniquely identified. We propose to use external information to solve the identification issue. We define a cross validated Kullback-Leibler information criterion to select the number of clusters and the warping penalty. The criterion is derived from the predictive classification likelihood considering the joint distribution of both the functional data and external variable and penalizes the uncertainty in the cluster membership. We evaluate our method through simulation and apply it to electrocardiographic data collected in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort study. We identify two distinct clusters of electrocardiogram (ECG) profiles, with the second cluster exhibiting ST segment depression, an indication of cardiac ischemia, compared to the normal ECG profiles in the first cluster.

Statistics in MedicineVol. 43(26)
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Kaiser Permanente, University of Pennsylvania, Tulane University, Johns Hopkins University, National Institutes of Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, University of California, San Francisco, Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research, Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of Cleveland, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Center for Research Resources, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Advanced Clustering Algorithms Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.