OP01.06: Accuracy and precision of sonographic fetal weight estimation in specific subgroups: important knowledge in clinical decision making

Fetal growth assessment by ultrasound is an essential part of decision making in modern obstetric care. The aim of this study was to evaluate accuracy and precision of fetal weight estimation in specific subgroups. The study population consisted of 31,521 singleton pregnancies delivered at 22+0 gestational weeks or later, with an ultrasound estimated fetal weight (EFW) performed within two days before delivery, registered in the Swedish Pregnancy Register between 2014 and 2021. Fetal biometric ultrasound measurements were used to calculate EFW according to the formula by Persson and Weldner. Systematic error (mean percentage error, MPE) was calculated and stratified by maternal BMI-categories, fetal sex, fetal position and EFW (estimated small, appropriate or large for gestational age; SGA, AGA or LGA), all in combination with gestational age. For the whole study population, MPE was −2.7 (SD 8.9). MPE was largest for the most preterm fetuses estimated as severe SGA (< 24 weeks and EFW < 3rd percentile, MPE -13.9 ± 14.2 SD). While actual birthweight was underestimated in all gestational weeks in fetuses estimated as severe SGA, actual birthweight was generally overestimated in fetuses estimated as severe LGA (> 97th percentile; see figure 1). When stratified by maternal BMI-categories, fetal sex and fetal position, minor differences in MPE were found. The systematic underestimation of actual birthweight was largest in extreme preterm estimated SGA-fetuses, while actual birthweight was generally overestimated in fetuses estimated as severe LGA. Knowledge about systematic errors in the fetal weight estimation formula used is of utmost importance in clinical decision making. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.27879
Primary Topic
Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OP01.06: Accuracy and precision of sonographic fetal weight estimation in specific subgroups: important knowledge in clinical decision making

Linda Lindström, Michaela Granfors, Owe Axelsson, Sven Cnattingius
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
article

OP01.06: Accuracy and precision of sonographic fetal weight estimation in specific subgroups: important knowledge in clinical decision making

Linda Lindström, Michaela Granfors, Owe Axelsson, Sven Cnattingius
article en

Abstract

Fetal growth assessment by ultrasound is an essential part of decision making in modern obstetric care. The aim of this study was to evaluate accuracy and precision of fetal weight estimation in specific subgroups. The study population consisted of 31,521 singleton pregnancies delivered at 22+0 gestational weeks or later, with an ultrasound estimated fetal weight (EFW) performed within two days before delivery, registered in the Swedish Pregnancy Register between 2014 and 2021. Fetal biometric ultrasound measurements were used to calculate EFW according to the formula by Persson and Weldner. Systematic error (mean percentage error, MPE) was calculated and stratified by maternal BMI-categories, fetal sex, fetal position and EFW (estimated small, appropriate or large for gestational age; SGA, AGA or LGA), all in combination with gestational age. For the whole study population, MPE was −2.7 (SD 8.9). MPE was largest for the most preterm fetuses estimated as severe SGA (< 24 weeks and EFW < 3rd percentile, MPE -13.9 ± 14.2 SD). While actual birthweight was underestimated in all gestational weeks in fetuses estimated as severe SGA, actual birthweight was generally overestimated in fetuses estimated as severe LGA (> 97th percentile; see figure 1). When stratified by maternal BMI-categories, fetal sex and fetal position, minor differences in MPE were found. The systematic underestimation of actual birthweight was largest in extreme preterm estimated SGA-fetuses, while actual birthweight was generally overestimated in fetuses estimated as severe LGA. Knowledge about systematic errors in the fetal weight estimation formula used is of utmost importance in clinical decision making. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 64(S1)
Uppsala University (SE), Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.