The development of biological soil crust along the time series is mediated by archaeal communities

• The biological soil crusts (BSCs) were compared across a time series spanning over 60 years. • Metagenome analysis revealed increasing community integration and complexity over time. • Archaea played a disproportionate role in community structure and stability. • Several key archaeal families could be related to BSC enzyme activities. Biological soil crusts (BSCs) play an essential role in soil stabilization and nutrient cycling in arid environments, being a hotspot of microbial activity including soil enzyme production. However, the changes in microbial communities of the BSCs from different age are poorly understood. In over a 60-year dune revegetation chronosequence (2021, 2016, 1973, and 1962) in the southeastern Tengger Desert, China, we compared the development of BSCs and underlying sands using metagenome sequencing and enzyme assays. In both BSCs and the underlying sand substrate, enzyme activity increased along the time series but was always greater for BSCs than the substrate, emphasizing the potential for nutrient cycling activity. A clear trend in community composition and co-occurrence network complexity was observed in the BSCs: the family-level taxonomic network of BSCs became more connected in the older age BSCs, while in the substrate, there was no such trend. Unexpectedly, considering their low relative abundance and diversity, archaea emerged as major keystones in establishing community networks, being key to network stability. In the underlying substrate, by contrast, archaea did not play this key role. During the time series of BSCs, the dominant archaeal groups were Nitrososphaeria, Methanomicrobia, Halobacteria, and an unclassified Thaumarchaeota, mainly linked to functional genes related to carbon and nitrogen, such as CHB2, xylA, amyA, amoB, nxrA, nxrB, and nirB. This suggests that in BSCs, the key role of archaea relates to their role in nitrogen cycling. This perspective adds to the emerging view that archaea play an important role in community structure and function in dryland environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoderma
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.117022
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.23

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The development of biological soil crust along the time series is mediated by archaeal communities

Rodica Pena, Bahar S. Razavi, Na Li, Bin Song et al.
8 citations
Geoderma
Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology
8.23
article

The development of biological soil crust along the time series is mediated by archaeal communities

Rodica Pena, Bahar S. Razavi, Na Li, Bin Song, Jonathan M. Adams, Zhiwei Xu, Zihao Liu, Zhenhua Yu, Zhiren Hu, Jie Fang
article en
8 citations

Abstract

• The biological soil crusts (BSCs) were compared across a time series spanning over 60 years. • Metagenome analysis revealed increasing community integration and complexity over time. • Archaea played a disproportionate role in community structure and stability. • Several key archaeal families could be related to BSC enzyme activities. Biological soil crusts (BSCs) play an essential role in soil stabilization and nutrient cycling in arid environments, being a hotspot of microbial activity including soil enzyme production. However, the changes in microbial communities of the BSCs from different age are poorly understood. In over a 60-year dune revegetation chronosequence (2021, 2016, 1973, and 1962) in the southeastern Tengger Desert, China, we compared the development of BSCs and underlying sands using metagenome sequencing and enzyme assays. In both BSCs and the underlying sand substrate, enzyme activity increased along the time series but was always greater for BSCs than the substrate, emphasizing the potential for nutrient cycling activity. A clear trend in community composition and co-occurrence network complexity was observed in the BSCs: the family-level taxonomic network of BSCs became more connected in the older age BSCs, while in the substrate, there was no such trend. Unexpectedly, considering their low relative abundance and diversity, archaea emerged as major keystones in establishing community networks, being key to network stability. In the underlying substrate, by contrast, archaea did not play this key role. During the time series of BSCs, the dominant archaeal groups were Nitrososphaeria, Methanomicrobia, Halobacteria, and an unclassified Thaumarchaeota, mainly linked to functional genes related to carbon and nitrogen, such as CHB2, xylA, amyA, amoB, nxrA, nxrB, and nirB. This suggests that in BSCs, the key role of archaea relates to their role in nitrogen cycling. This perspective adds to the emerging view that archaea play an important role in community structure and function in dryland environments.

GeodermaVol. 449
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE), Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology (CN), University of Reading (GB), Nanjing University (CN)
Jiangsu Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Fund, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology
8.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.