So is it better than something else? Using the results of a random-effects meta-analysis to characterize the magnitude of an effect size as a percentile.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychological Methods
Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000704
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

So is it better than something else? Using the results of a random-effects meta-analysis to characterize the magnitude of an effect size as a percentile.

Peter Boedeker, Gena Nelson, Hannah Carter
2 citations
Psychological Methods
Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
1.09
article

So is it better than something else? Using the results of a random-effects meta-analysis to characterize the magnitude of an effect size as a percentile.

Peter Boedeker, Gena Nelson, Hannah Carter
article en
2 citations

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.
Psychological Methods
Boise State University (US), University of Oregon (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
1.09
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.