OC13.05: Developing pre‐eclampsia: does gestational age matter?

To study the risk of pre-eclampsia in ongoing pregnancies according to gestational age. We also studied whether the gestational age specific risk of developing pre-eclampsia has changed across the last decades. In this retrospective cohort study, we used data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway, and included all singleton pregnancies with delivery between gestational week 21 and 43 in Norway during the years 1984-2019 (n = 1 955 082). We calculated the proportion of pregnancies with pre-eclampsia at each gestational week. The numerator was pre-eclamptic pregnancies with delivery, and the denominator was all pregnancies still ongoing at the gestational week being studied. We performed analyses for the study period as a whole and separately for ten-year intervals within the study period. The total proportion of pregnancies with pre-eclampsia was 3.2%. The risk of developing pre-eclampsia increased by gestational age. At gestational week 28, the risk was 0.2 in 1000 ongoing pregnancies. The risk was 5.2 in 1000 ongoing pregnancies at gestational week 38, and 13.6 in 1000 ongoing pregnancies at gestational week 42. We found no large changes in gestational age specific risk of pre-eclampsia across the study period. The risk of developing pre-eclampsia increased almost exponentially by increasing gestational age. Thus, the reported decline in cumulative incidence of pre-eclampsia from some countries, could partly be explained by an increase in labour inductions and thereby shorter duration of pregnancy. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.27812
Primary Topic
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OC13.05: Developing pre‐eclampsia: does gestational age matter?

Camilla Haavaldsen, Anne Eskild
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
article

OC13.05: Developing pre‐eclampsia: does gestational age matter?

Camilla Haavaldsen, Anne Eskild
article en

Abstract

To study the risk of pre-eclampsia in ongoing pregnancies according to gestational age. We also studied whether the gestational age specific risk of developing pre-eclampsia has changed across the last decades. In this retrospective cohort study, we used data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway, and included all singleton pregnancies with delivery between gestational week 21 and 43 in Norway during the years 1984-2019 (n = 1 955 082). We calculated the proportion of pregnancies with pre-eclampsia at each gestational week. The numerator was pre-eclamptic pregnancies with delivery, and the denominator was all pregnancies still ongoing at the gestational week being studied. We performed analyses for the study period as a whole and separately for ten-year intervals within the study period. The total proportion of pregnancies with pre-eclampsia was 3.2%. The risk of developing pre-eclampsia increased by gestational age. At gestational week 28, the risk was 0.2 in 1000 ongoing pregnancies. The risk was 5.2 in 1000 ongoing pregnancies at gestational week 38, and 13.6 in 1000 ongoing pregnancies at gestational week 42. We found no large changes in gestational age specific risk of pre-eclampsia across the study period. The risk of developing pre-eclampsia increased almost exponentially by increasing gestational age. Thus, the reported decline in cumulative incidence of pre-eclampsia from some countries, could partly be explained by an increase in labour inductions and thereby shorter duration of pregnancy. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 64(S1)
Akershus University Hospital (NO)
Fundació Institut de Recerca Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.