OP03.01: Tru‐cut biopsy in gynecological cancer: adequacy, accuracy, safety and clinical applicability

The aim of this study was to assess the adequacy, accuracy and safety of tru-cut biopsy. A retrospective population-based review of 328 biopsies was conducted. Indications for tru-cut biopsies were diagnosis of primary tumours, metastases and suspected recurrences. A tissue sample was considered adequate when the quality/quality was sufficient to identify the subtype/origin of the tumour. Accuracy was defined as agreement between the diagnosis of the tru-cut biopsy and the postoperative histology. Complications within 30 days after the biopsy procedure were registered. In total, 300 biopsies were identified as tru-cut biopsies. The overall adequacy was 86.3%, varying between 80.8% and 93.5%, respectively, when performed by a gynecological oncologist or a gynecologist with ultrasound diagnosis subspeciality. Sampling of a pelvic mass had a lower adequacy (81.6%) compared with sampling of the omentum (93.9%) or carcinomatosis (91.5%). The accuracy was 97.5%, and the complication rate was 1.3%. The tru-cut biopsy is a safe and reliable diagnostic method with a high accuracy and a good adequacy, depending on the site of the tissue sample, indications for the biopsy and the experience of the operator. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.27892
Primary Topic
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OP03.01: Tru‐cut biopsy in gynecological cancer: adequacy, accuracy, safety and clinical applicability

Päivi Kannisto, Karina Liuba, Mihaela Asp, Susanne Malander et al.
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
article

OP03.01: Tru‐cut biopsy in gynecological cancer: adequacy, accuracy, safety and clinical applicability

Päivi Kannisto, Karina Liuba, Mihaela Asp, Susanne Malander, Anna Måsbäck, Ingrida Mockute
article en

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the adequacy, accuracy and safety of tru-cut biopsy. A retrospective population-based review of 328 biopsies was conducted. Indications for tru-cut biopsies were diagnosis of primary tumours, metastases and suspected recurrences. A tissue sample was considered adequate when the quality/quality was sufficient to identify the subtype/origin of the tumour. Accuracy was defined as agreement between the diagnosis of the tru-cut biopsy and the postoperative histology. Complications within 30 days after the biopsy procedure were registered. In total, 300 biopsies were identified as tru-cut biopsies. The overall adequacy was 86.3%, varying between 80.8% and 93.5%, respectively, when performed by a gynecological oncologist or a gynecologist with ultrasound diagnosis subspeciality. Sampling of a pelvic mass had a lower adequacy (81.6%) compared with sampling of the omentum (93.9%) or carcinomatosis (91.5%). The accuracy was 97.5%, and the complication rate was 1.3%. The tru-cut biopsy is a safe and reliable diagnostic method with a high accuracy and a good adequacy, depending on the site of the tissue sample, indications for the biopsy and the experience of the operator. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 64(S1)
Lund University (SE), Skåne University Hospital (SE)
Università Degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emila, Università degli Studi di Padova, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Università degli Studi G. d'Annunzio Chieti - Pescara
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.