EP21.02: Location of the gestational sac in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology

Previous studies indicate increased risk of placenta previa in pregnancies following blastocyst transfer compared to pregnancies conceived without medical assistance. In this study, we investigated location of the gestational sac in early pregnancies conceived by embryo transfer of fresh or frozen thawed blastocysts. This observational study was performed at St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, from February 2022 to January 2024. 127 women with an ongoing and normally sited pregnancy after assisted reproductive technology were examined by ultrasound 21 days after single blastocyst transfer, corresponding with gestational week (GW) 5+5. Location of the gestational sac was determined by 3D ultrasound. The uterine cavity was divided into three equal sized parts from fundus to inner cervical os, and location classified as to where 50% of the gestational sac was placed. In GW 5+5, 78 (61%) of the 127 gestational sacs were placed in the upper third, 47 (37%) in the mid third and 2 (1.6%) in the lower third of the uterine cavity. Subgroup analyses comparing 22 fresh and 105 frozen thawed embryos showed no difference in location of the gestational sacs (p 0.31). The absolute majority (98.5%) of the gestational sacs were implanted in the mid or upper third of the uterine cavity. We did not find any difference in location for gestational sacs when comparing fresh versus frozen thawed embryos. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28844
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EP21.02: Location of the gestational sac in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology

Kjersti Westvik‐Johari, E.B. Seljeflot, B.H. Kahrs, Sotirios H. Saravelos et al.
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

EP21.02: Location of the gestational sac in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology

Kjersti Westvik‐Johari, E.B. Seljeflot, B.H. Kahrs, Sotirios H. Saravelos, Signe Opdahl, Torbjørn Moe Eggebø, H. Mørch, Holger Schilling
article en

Abstract

Previous studies indicate increased risk of placenta previa in pregnancies following blastocyst transfer compared to pregnancies conceived without medical assistance. In this study, we investigated location of the gestational sac in early pregnancies conceived by embryo transfer of fresh or frozen thawed blastocysts. This observational study was performed at St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, from February 2022 to January 2024. 127 women with an ongoing and normally sited pregnancy after assisted reproductive technology were examined by ultrasound 21 days after single blastocyst transfer, corresponding with gestational week (GW) 5+5. Location of the gestational sac was determined by 3D ultrasound. The uterine cavity was divided into three equal sized parts from fundus to inner cervical os, and location classified as to where 50% of the gestational sac was placed. In GW 5+5, 78 (61%) of the 127 gestational sacs were placed in the upper third, 47 (37%) in the mid third and 2 (1.6%) in the lower third of the uterine cavity. Subgroup analyses comparing 22 fresh and 105 frozen thawed embryos showed no difference in location of the gestational sacs (p 0.31). The absolute majority (98.5%) of the gestational sacs were implanted in the mid or upper third of the uterine cavity. We did not find any difference in location for gestational sacs when comparing fresh versus frozen thawed embryos. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 64(S1)
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Norwegian Environment Agency (NO), St Olav's University Hospital (NO), NTNU Samfunnsforskning (NO), Imperial College London (GB)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.