EP08.23: Speckle tracking echocardiography in fetuses at risk for late‐onset FGR: can we discriminate SGA and FGR and predict the progression from SGA to FGR?

To evaluate the role of speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) in discriminating between small-for-gestational age (SGA) and fetal growth restriction (FGR) and predicting the progression from SGA to FGR within a selected cohort of fetuses at risk for late-onset FGR. Multicentre prospective study including non-anomalous singleton pregnancies with suspected late-onset FGR as defined by abdominal circumference (AC) or estimated fetal weight (EFW) below the 10th percentile for the gestation or by a reduction of the longitudinal growth of the AC by over 50 percentiles compared to second trimester anomaly scan. Two-dimensional ultrasound clips of the four-chamber view of the fetal heart were prospectively collected, and offline STE was performed using TomTec GmbH by one dedicated operator. A cross-sectional comparison of the fetal cardiac function as evaluated by means of STE was performed between SGA and FGR fetuses and then among fetuses classified as SGA and FGR throughout monitoring and those initially classified as SGA but evolving into FGR according to the Delphi criteria. 92 cases were included, of whom 62 FGR at delivery; 30 (32.6%) cases were SGA and 29 (31.5%) throughout monitoring, respectively, and 33 (35.9%) evolved as FGR from initial SGA. At paired comparison FGR fetuses showed lower right ventricular (RV) GRS compared to SGA fetuses (19.6##+12.1 vs 23.1##+13.1, p = 0.04). When comparing the fetuses classified as SGA, FGR or evolving FGR, the latter showed higher RVGRS compared SGA (24.5##+12.9 vs 19.0##+12.3, p < 0.01) and also compared to FGR (24.5##+12.9 vs 19.3##+12.0, p < 0.01). No difference in STE parameters were noted between SGA and FGR. Findings from this study show differences in terms of right ventricular strain between SGA, FGR and evolving FGR suggesting and increased cardiac deformation in the latter group.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28351
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EP08.23: Speckle tracking echocardiography in fetuses at risk for late‐onset FGR: can we discriminate SGA and FGR and predict the progression from SGA to FGR?

G.M. Celora, L. Youssef, Silvia Salvi, Giuseppe Maria Maruotti et al.
1 citations
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
0.39
article

EP08.23: Speckle tracking echocardiography in fetuses at risk for late‐onset FGR: can we discriminate SGA and FGR and predict the progression from SGA to FGR?

G.M. Celora, L. Youssef, Silvia Salvi, Giuseppe Maria Maruotti, T. Nguyen, A. di Tonto, Antonio Lanzone, F. Crispi, G. Schera, B. Valentini, Tamara Stampalija, A. Dall'Asta, Chiara Melito, E. Corno, T. Ghi, Stefania Sorrentino, L. Nogué, Laura Sarno, M. Baffa
article en
1 citations

Abstract

To evaluate the role of speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) in discriminating between small-for-gestational age (SGA) and fetal growth restriction (FGR) and predicting the progression from SGA to FGR within a selected cohort of fetuses at risk for late-onset FGR. Multicentre prospective study including non-anomalous singleton pregnancies with suspected late-onset FGR as defined by abdominal circumference (AC) or estimated fetal weight (EFW) below the 10th percentile for the gestation or by a reduction of the longitudinal growth of the AC by over 50 percentiles compared to second trimester anomaly scan. Two-dimensional ultrasound clips of the four-chamber view of the fetal heart were prospectively collected, and offline STE was performed using TomTec GmbH by one dedicated operator. A cross-sectional comparison of the fetal cardiac function as evaluated by means of STE was performed between SGA and FGR fetuses and then among fetuses classified as SGA and FGR throughout monitoring and those initially classified as SGA but evolving into FGR according to the Delphi criteria. 92 cases were included, of whom 62 FGR at delivery; 30 (32.6%) cases were SGA and 29 (31.5%) throughout monitoring, respectively, and 33 (35.9%) evolved as FGR from initial SGA. At paired comparison FGR fetuses showed lower right ventricular (RV) GRS compared to SGA fetuses (19.6##+12.1 vs 23.1##+13.1, p = 0.04). When comparing the fetuses classified as SGA, FGR or evolving FGR, the latter showed higher RVGRS compared SGA (24.5##+12.9 vs 19.0##+12.3, p < 0.01) and also compared to FGR (24.5##+12.9 vs 19.3##+12.0, p < 0.01). No difference in STE parameters were noted between SGA and FGR. Findings from this study show differences in terms of right ventricular strain between SGA, FGR and evolving FGR suggesting and increased cardiac deformation in the latter group.

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 64(S1)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), University of Parma (IT), Hospital Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona (ES), IRCCS Materno Infantile Burlo Garofolo (IT), University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Reduced inequalities, Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
0.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.