EP21.04: Prediction of early pregnancy viability in pregnancies of uncertain viability on ultrasound

To develop a new prediction model for predicting pregnancy viability in a population of patients with pregnancies of uncertain viability (mean gestational sac diameter <25mm without a visible embryo, or an embryo measuring <7mm without cardiac activity). Providing women with a numerical prediction of viability has been shown to be acceptable and useful in reducing anxiety while they await a follow-up scan, but the model in use was derived before the definition of miscarriage was changed in 2012. This was a prospective observational study of 220 women with pregnancies of uncertain viability. Eleven independent variables (maternal age, BMI, smoking status, gestational age, bleeding status, pain score, gestational sac diameter, yolk sac diameter, Crown–rump length, serum progesterone and bhCG) were analysed in two stages. First, each variable's association with pregnancy viability, then their joint association with pregnancy viability in a multivariate logistic regression. A backwards selection procedure was used in the final model to retain only factors associated with pregnancy viability. Maternal age OR 0.36 (95%CI 0.23-0.57, p < 0.001), gestational age OR 0.38 (95%CI 0.24-0.62, p < 0.001), mean sac diameter OR 1.72 (95%CI 0.93-3.18, p = 0.08), presence of a yolk sac OR 4.53 (95%CI 1.81-11.3, p = 0.001), and serum progesterone OR 2.33 (95%CI 1.60-3.38, p < 0.001) were independently associated with pregnancy viability. The following model was devised to produce a probability score P=ey/(1+ey) where p=probability of a viable pregnancy, e=exponential function (inverse log) and y = 8.488-0.205.age-0.960.gestational age+0.109.sac diameter+1.510 if yolk sac present+0.042.progesterone. We have successfully produced a prediction model for pregnancy viability based on maternal age, gestational age, mean sac diameter, presence of a yolk sac and serum progesterone. This could be integrated into clinical practice in Early Pregnancy Units. A prospective validation study is currently underway.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28846
Primary Topic
Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EP21.04: Prediction of early pregnancy viability in pregnancies of uncertain viability on ultrasound

Jackie Ross, Obianuju Nzelu, Jemma Johns, D. Nana et al.
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
article

EP21.04: Prediction of early pregnancy viability in pregnancies of uncertain viability on ultrasound

Jackie Ross, Obianuju Nzelu, Jemma Johns, D. Nana, E. Doran
article en

Abstract

To develop a new prediction model for predicting pregnancy viability in a population of patients with pregnancies of uncertain viability (mean gestational sac diameter <25mm without a visible embryo, or an embryo measuring <7mm without cardiac activity). Providing women with a numerical prediction of viability has been shown to be acceptable and useful in reducing anxiety while they await a follow-up scan, but the model in use was derived before the definition of miscarriage was changed in 2012. This was a prospective observational study of 220 women with pregnancies of uncertain viability. Eleven independent variables (maternal age, BMI, smoking status, gestational age, bleeding status, pain score, gestational sac diameter, yolk sac diameter, Crown–rump length, serum progesterone and bhCG) were analysed in two stages. First, each variable's association with pregnancy viability, then their joint association with pregnancy viability in a multivariate logistic regression. A backwards selection procedure was used in the final model to retain only factors associated with pregnancy viability. Maternal age OR 0.36 (95%CI 0.23-0.57, p < 0.001), gestational age OR 0.38 (95%CI 0.24-0.62, p < 0.001), mean sac diameter OR 1.72 (95%CI 0.93-3.18, p = 0.08), presence of a yolk sac OR 4.53 (95%CI 1.81-11.3, p = 0.001), and serum progesterone OR 2.33 (95%CI 1.60-3.38, p < 0.001) were independently associated with pregnancy viability. The following model was devised to produce a probability score P=ey/(1+ey) where p=probability of a viable pregnancy, e=exponential function (inverse log) and y = 8.488-0.205.age-0.960.gestational age+0.109.sac diameter+1.510 if yolk sac present+0.042.progesterone. We have successfully produced a prediction model for pregnancy viability based on maternal age, gestational age, mean sac diameter, presence of a yolk sac and serum progesterone. This could be integrated into clinical practice in Early Pregnancy Units. A prospective validation study is currently underway.

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 64(S1)
King's College London (GB), Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB), King's College Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.