OC15.07: Application of machine learning methods to predict the success of expectant or medical management of miscarriage

The aim of this study is to use machine learning to develop a clinical decision support tool to offer women personalised outcome prediction for expectant and medical miscarriage management. A retrospective, multi-site study of patients selected for expectant or medical management of miscarriage was undertaken. A total of 1075 patients across two hospital early pregnancy units were eligible for inclusion. The clinical variables collected included patient demographics, history and ultrasound features. These 14 variables were selected following a systematic review of studies evaluating predictors of miscarriage management outcomes and discussion with clinical experts. These variables were routinely recorded as part of the routine clinical care of miscarriage patients. A combination of 11 linear, Bayesian, neural-net and tree-based machine learning algorithms were applied to 8 different feature sets. Receiver-Operator Characteristic (ROC) curves and Area Under the Curve (AUC) were created for the training, validation and test set results for our best performing model and feature selection combination. Parameters were in the majority well matched across training-validation and external test sets. The respective optimum training, validation and external test set AUC scores were as follows in the expectant management cohort: 0.72 (95% CI 0.67,0.77), 0.63 (95% CI 0.53,0.73) and 0.70 (95% CI 0.60,0.79) (Logistic Regression (LR) in combination with Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO)). The AUC scores in the medical cohort were 0.64 (95% CI 0.56,0.72), 0.62 (95% CI 0.45,0.77) and 0.71 (95% CI 0.58,0.83) (Logistic Regression (LR) in combination with Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) feature reduction). This robust machine learning method has been validated and externally tested. This study sets the stage for future clinical trials prospectively offering quantitative personalised outcome prediction for patients making a decision on their miscarriage management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.27828
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OC15.07: Application of machine learning methods to predict the success of expectant or medical management of miscarriage

M. Pikovsky, A.M. Novak, Tom Bourne, Srdjan Saso et al.
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
AI in cancer detection
article

OC15.07: Application of machine learning methods to predict the success of expectant or medical management of miscarriage

M. Pikovsky, A.M. Novak, Tom Bourne, Srdjan Saso, Sughashini Murugesu, C. Stalder, M. Al‐Memar, E. Braun, N. Parker, Jennifer Frances Barcroft, Nicole Cooper, Kristofer Linton‐Reid, Eric O. Aboagye
article en

Abstract

The aim of this study is to use machine learning to develop a clinical decision support tool to offer women personalised outcome prediction for expectant and medical miscarriage management. A retrospective, multi-site study of patients selected for expectant or medical management of miscarriage was undertaken. A total of 1075 patients across two hospital early pregnancy units were eligible for inclusion. The clinical variables collected included patient demographics, history and ultrasound features. These 14 variables were selected following a systematic review of studies evaluating predictors of miscarriage management outcomes and discussion with clinical experts. These variables were routinely recorded as part of the routine clinical care of miscarriage patients. A combination of 11 linear, Bayesian, neural-net and tree-based machine learning algorithms were applied to 8 different feature sets. Receiver-Operator Characteristic (ROC) curves and Area Under the Curve (AUC) were created for the training, validation and test set results for our best performing model and feature selection combination. Parameters were in the majority well matched across training-validation and external test sets. The respective optimum training, validation and external test set AUC scores were as follows in the expectant management cohort: 0.72 (95% CI 0.67,0.77), 0.63 (95% CI 0.53,0.73) and 0.70 (95% CI 0.60,0.79) (Logistic Regression (LR) in combination with Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO)). The AUC scores in the medical cohort were 0.64 (95% CI 0.56,0.72), 0.62 (95% CI 0.45,0.77) and 0.71 (95% CI 0.58,0.83) (Logistic Regression (LR) in combination with Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) feature reduction). This robust machine learning method has been validated and externally tested. This study sets the stage for future clinical trials prospectively offering quantitative personalised outcome prediction for patients making a decision on their miscarriage management.

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 64(S1)
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.