OC14.01: *Constructing small‐for‐gestational‐age prediction models before 32 weeks of gestation with machine learning

To develop machine learning prediction models with multimodal clinical data and compare the predictive performance for SGA with datasets before 32 weeks' gestation. This retrospective study included singleton pregnancies and the pregnancy data before 32 weeks' gestation were categorised into three datasets: first, second and early third trimesters (T1, T2, T3). The LightGBM framework was utilised to assess the variable importance by employing a five-fold cross-validation. Seven machine learning algorithms were used with an 8:2 ratio for training and testing. The model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and sensitivity of test sets at the false positive rate of 10%. We included data of 4,394 women with 148 SGA. Among them, 1353, 2705 and 2964 women had T1, T2 and T3 ultrasound screening (SGA = 41, 82, 93). Seven datasets were generated after merging. The top twenty predictors were incorporated into machine learning. Areas under the ROC of ultrasonic and multimodal clinical prediction models were better than clinical prediction models. In T1, the ultrasonic prediction model performed well (AUC of 0.74, sensitivity of 0.50) with best predictor of the Crown–rump length (CRL). In T2 and T3, baseline characteristics and biochemical tests improved significantly performance based on ultrasound prediction models (AUC: 0.87 vs. 0.70, sensitivity: 0.56 vs. 0.25 in second trimester; AUC: 0.83 vs. 0.82, sensitivity: 0.63 vs. 0.42 in early third trimester). Combining ultrasound screening data of three stages, the model performed extremely excellent (AUC of 0.97, sensitivity of 0.88) with most predictive factor of ultrasound estimated birthweight in T3. Ultrasound screening in T1 is predictive for SGA, with CRL being closely relative. In T2 and T3, the multimodal prediction models have best sensitivity of SGA. Combining ultrasound screening data from three stages provides richer information, especially fetal growth trends, facilitating a better capture of complex relationships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.27814
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OC14.01: *Constructing small‐for‐gestational‐age prediction models before 32 weeks of gestation with machine learning

Ying Zhu, Kunjie Yuan, Xiaoyi Chen, Y. Huang
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Machine Learning in Healthcare
article

OC14.01: *Constructing small‐for‐gestational‐age prediction models before 32 weeks of gestation with machine learning

Ying Zhu, Kunjie Yuan, Xiaoyi Chen, Y. Huang
article en

Abstract

To develop machine learning prediction models with multimodal clinical data and compare the predictive performance for SGA with datasets before 32 weeks' gestation. This retrospective study included singleton pregnancies and the pregnancy data before 32 weeks' gestation were categorised into three datasets: first, second and early third trimesters (T1, T2, T3). The LightGBM framework was utilised to assess the variable importance by employing a five-fold cross-validation. Seven machine learning algorithms were used with an 8:2 ratio for training and testing. The model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and sensitivity of test sets at the false positive rate of 10%. We included data of 4,394 women with 148 SGA. Among them, 1353, 2705 and 2964 women had T1, T2 and T3 ultrasound screening (SGA = 41, 82, 93). Seven datasets were generated after merging. The top twenty predictors were incorporated into machine learning. Areas under the ROC of ultrasonic and multimodal clinical prediction models were better than clinical prediction models. In T1, the ultrasonic prediction model performed well (AUC of 0.74, sensitivity of 0.50) with best predictor of the Crown–rump length (CRL). In T2 and T3, baseline characteristics and biochemical tests improved significantly performance based on ultrasound prediction models (AUC: 0.87 vs. 0.70, sensitivity: 0.56 vs. 0.25 in second trimester; AUC: 0.83 vs. 0.82, sensitivity: 0.63 vs. 0.42 in early third trimester). Combining ultrasound screening data of three stages, the model performed extremely excellent (AUC of 0.97, sensitivity of 0.88) with most predictive factor of ultrasound estimated birthweight in T3. Ultrasound screening in T1 is predictive for SGA, with CRL being closely relative. In T2 and T3, the multimodal prediction models have best sensitivity of SGA. Combining ultrasound screening data from three stages provides richer information, especially fetal growth trends, facilitating a better capture of complex relationships.

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 64(S1)
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (CN), The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Università degli Studi di Milano, Università degli Studi di Padova, Sapienza Università di Roma, Università degli Studi di Brescia
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Machine Learning in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.