OC06.06: Management and outcomes following anomalous findings at the pre‐NIPT ultrasound

To evaluate the clinical utility of the pre-NIPT scan at 10-14 weeks gestation in singleton pregnancies and examine the genetic and structural outcomes in those with anomalous pre-NIPT ultrasound findings in a cohort undertaking definitive prenatal testing. Pre-NIPT scans in 902 patients with prenatal microarray testing were classified into 5 groups: (I) structural abnormality; (II) septated NT enlargement; (III) generalised edema; (IV) NT > 95th centile without generalised edema and (V) no abnormality detected. For each pre-NIPT group, aneuploidy was identified in 61% (I), 54% (II), 48% (III) and 44% (IV). Similar rates of genetic abnormality were found in early and late pre-NIPT scans (CRL < or > 45 mm). Structural abnormalities not identified at the pre-NIPT scan were found in 57 cases at the later first trimester scan which changed management for those with low-risk NIPT results. NT measurement above the 95th centile at 10-11 weeks (2.2 mm) was associated with aneuploidy in 48% and if the NT enlargement progressed above 3.5mm at a later 11-14 week scan, the rate of aneuploidy increased to 55%. Most microdeletion cases do not have a significant pre-NIPT finding. The high incidence of genetic abnormality identified after an abnormal pre-NIPT scan justifies bypassing NIPT screening in favour of offering CVS. Combining gwNIPT with a 12-13 week ultrasound to review NT measurement and fetal structural assessment provides valuable additional information without increasing the risk of missing triploidy or genetic abnormalities currently not detected by gwNIPT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.27759
Primary Topic
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OC06.06: Management and outcomes following anomalous findings at the pre‐NIPT ultrasound

Andrew McLennan, Fergus Scott
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
article

OC06.06: Management and outcomes following anomalous findings at the pre‐NIPT ultrasound

Andrew McLennan, Fergus Scott
article en

Abstract

To evaluate the clinical utility of the pre-NIPT scan at 10-14 weeks gestation in singleton pregnancies and examine the genetic and structural outcomes in those with anomalous pre-NIPT ultrasound findings in a cohort undertaking definitive prenatal testing. Pre-NIPT scans in 902 patients with prenatal microarray testing were classified into 5 groups: (I) structural abnormality; (II) septated NT enlargement; (III) generalised edema; (IV) NT > 95th centile without generalised edema and (V) no abnormality detected. For each pre-NIPT group, aneuploidy was identified in 61% (I), 54% (II), 48% (III) and 44% (IV). Similar rates of genetic abnormality were found in early and late pre-NIPT scans (CRL < or > 45 mm). Structural abnormalities not identified at the pre-NIPT scan were found in 57 cases at the later first trimester scan which changed management for those with low-risk NIPT results. NT measurement above the 95th centile at 10-11 weeks (2.2 mm) was associated with aneuploidy in 48% and if the NT enlargement progressed above 3.5mm at a later 11-14 week scan, the rate of aneuploidy increased to 55%. Most microdeletion cases do not have a significant pre-NIPT finding. The high incidence of genetic abnormality identified after an abnormal pre-NIPT scan justifies bypassing NIPT screening in favour of offering CVS. Combining gwNIPT with a 12-13 week ultrasound to review NT measurement and fetal structural assessment provides valuable additional information without increasing the risk of missing triploidy or genetic abnormalities currently not detected by gwNIPT.

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 64(S1)
The University of Sydney (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.