Anomaly detection in collider physics via factorized observables
To maximize the discovery potential of high-energy colliders, experimental searches should be sensitive to unforeseen new physics scenarios. This goal has motivated the use of machine learning for unsupervised anomaly detection. In this paper, we introduce a new anomaly detection strategy called : factorized observables for regressing conditional expectations. Our approach is based on the inductive bias of factorization, which is the idea that the physics governing different energy scales can be treated as approximately independent. Assuming factorization holds separately for signal and background processes, the appearance of nontrivial correlations between low- and high-energy observables is a robust indicator of new physics. Under the most restrictive form of factorization, a machine-learned model trained to identify such correlations will in fact converge to the optimal new physics classifier. We test on a benchmark anomaly detection task for the Large Hadron Collider involving collimated sprays of particles called jets. By teasing out correlations between the kinematics and substructure of jets, our method can reliably extract percent-level signal fractions. This strategy for uncovering new physics adds to the growing toolbox of anomaly detection methods for collider physics with a complementary set of assumptions. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
Authors
- Jesse Thaler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2406-8160)
- Raymond Andrew Wynne (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1331-8830)
- Eric Metodiev (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3995-5686)
Institutions
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- The NSF AI Institute for Artificial Intelligence and Fundamental Interactions (US)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
- Published
- 2024-09-09
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.110.055012
- Citations
- 8
- Primary Topic
- Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 5.28
Funders
- National Science Foundation
- U.S. Department of Energy
- Simons Foundation
- High Energy Physics
- Nuclear Physics