EP24.31: Individuals' preferences for endometriosis diagnosis tests: focus group discussions with individuals diagnosed with endometriosis

Endometriosis affects approximately 10% of reproductive-age individuals and is diagnosed through methods including anamnesis, physical examination, imaging, biomarkers, and surgery with histological assessment. As we move toward a medical culture that prioritises autonomy and patient involvement, we must consider how these principles are applicable to the diagnostic process for endometriosis. This study hopes to understand and identify existing patient preferences for endometriosis diagnosis to promote best clinical approaches and patient comfort. The development of individuals' preferences for endometriosis diagnosis tests IPEDT comprises four steps. This study concentrated on the initial step, which entailed conducting semi-structured focus group discussions with individuals diagnosed with endometriosis to ascertain their perspectives on the diagnosis process. The analysis of transcripts followed grounded theory methodology, with two authors independently coding the data. These codes were then organised into categories and themes to reflect participant perspectives. We conducted two focus groups with seven individuals, aged 26 to 56, all diagnosed with endometriosis. Through these discussions, we identified five key themes perceived as important by participants when selecting a diagnostic method for endometriosis: 1) expertise of healthcare provider (7/7 participants), 2) patient-physician rapport (7/7 participants), 3) visualization of endometriosis (3/7 participants), 4) accuracy of diagnostic test (3/7 participants), and 5) risk of complications (2/7 participants). The unique insights garnered from this study helped to further our understanding of patient preferences regarding the diagnosis of endometriosis and the level of awareness patients have about the different diagnostic methods used to diagnose endometriosis. These findings will help guide the next step of the study which involves a discreet choice experiment and will help to educate physicians in best practices to follow in their clinics based on the patient experience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29037
Primary Topic
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EP24.31: Individuals' preferences for endometriosis diagnosis tests: focus group discussions with individuals diagnosed with endometriosis

Jacques W.M. Maas, Paul‐Henri Roméo, Mathew Leonardi, Suzanne J. Dedden et al.
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
article

EP24.31: Individuals' preferences for endometriosis diagnosis tests: focus group discussions with individuals diagnosed with endometriosis

Jacques W.M. Maas, Paul‐Henri Roméo, Mathew Leonardi, Suzanne J. Dedden, Tiffany Yeretsian, K. McGowan
article en

Abstract

Endometriosis affects approximately 10% of reproductive-age individuals and is diagnosed through methods including anamnesis, physical examination, imaging, biomarkers, and surgery with histological assessment. As we move toward a medical culture that prioritises autonomy and patient involvement, we must consider how these principles are applicable to the diagnostic process for endometriosis. This study hopes to understand and identify existing patient preferences for endometriosis diagnosis to promote best clinical approaches and patient comfort. The development of individuals' preferences for endometriosis diagnosis tests IPEDT comprises four steps. This study concentrated on the initial step, which entailed conducting semi-structured focus group discussions with individuals diagnosed with endometriosis to ascertain their perspectives on the diagnosis process. The analysis of transcripts followed grounded theory methodology, with two authors independently coding the data. These codes were then organised into categories and themes to reflect participant perspectives. We conducted two focus groups with seven individuals, aged 26 to 56, all diagnosed with endometriosis. Through these discussions, we identified five key themes perceived as important by participants when selecting a diagnostic method for endometriosis: 1) expertise of healthcare provider (7/7 participants), 2) patient-physician rapport (7/7 participants), 3) visualization of endometriosis (3/7 participants), 4) accuracy of diagnostic test (3/7 participants), and 5) risk of complications (2/7 participants). The unique insights garnered from this study helped to further our understanding of patient preferences regarding the diagnosis of endometriosis and the level of awareness patients have about the different diagnostic methods used to diagnose endometriosis. These findings will help guide the next step of the study which involves a discreet choice experiment and will help to educate physicians in best practices to follow in their clinics based on the patient experience.

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 64(S1)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Maastricht University (NL), Máxima Medisch Centrum (NL), McMaster University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.