EP24.05: Prospective study: transvaginal ultrasound for endometriosis, incorporating IDEA consensus and novel superficial endometriosis inclusion

Transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) is crucial for diagnosing endometriosis, guided by the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) guidelines. While TVS excels in diagnosing ovarian (OE) and deep endometriosis (DE), superficial endometriosis (SE) remains elusive. Previous studies relied on outdated classification guidelines, hindering our understanding of TVS diagnostic accuracy. This study aims to pioneer our understanding of TVS accuracy for DE, OE, and SE, using IDEA consensus and updated guidelines. We performed a prospective diagnostic accuracy study at a tertiary endometriosis referral centre. The index test was TVS, reported in accordance with IDEA consensus and laparoscopy as the reference standard, conducted by the same surgeon sonologist. SE and DE were defined according to the novel classification guidelines as the presence or absence of infiltration. Accuracy (Acc), sensitivity (Sens), specificity (Spec), positive and negative predictive values (PPV/NPV) were calculated for each phenotype and site relative to the reference standard. 125 participants were included. Diagnostic performance of TVS in DE: Acc 92.7 - 99.2%, Sens 82.3 - 100%, Spec 97.0 - 100%, PPV 94.1 - 100%, NPV 88.9 - 100%. For OE of the left and right ovary, respectively, was: Acc 98.3% and 98.4%, Sens 95.0% and 94.9%, Spec 100% and 100%, PPV 100% and 100%, NPV 97.6% and 97.7%. SE assessment in the population excluding DE, OE, and POD obliteration showed: Acc 73.9 - 87.0%, Sens 12.5 - 54.9%, Spec 100%, PPV 100%, NPV 72.2 - 84.6%. TVS demonstrates strong diagnostic performance for DE and OE across anatomical sites. While diagnosing SE is challenging, TVS exhibits strong specificity. These findings support TVS as a primary diagnostic for DE and OE, with enhanced accuracy. However, novel diagnostics are needed to confidently rule out SE, reducing diagnostic delay and improving surgical planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29012
Primary Topic
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EP24.05: Prospective study: transvaginal ultrasound for endometriosis, incorporating IDEA consensus and novel superficial endometriosis inclusion

J. Tigdi, Ido Mick, Mahsa Gholiof, Mathew Leonardi et al.
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
article

EP24.05: Prospective study: transvaginal ultrasound for endometriosis, incorporating IDEA consensus and novel superficial endometriosis inclusion

J. Tigdi, Ido Mick, Mahsa Gholiof, Mathew Leonardi, Shay M. Freger, M. Marien
article en

Abstract

Transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) is crucial for diagnosing endometriosis, guided by the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) guidelines. While TVS excels in diagnosing ovarian (OE) and deep endometriosis (DE), superficial endometriosis (SE) remains elusive. Previous studies relied on outdated classification guidelines, hindering our understanding of TVS diagnostic accuracy. This study aims to pioneer our understanding of TVS accuracy for DE, OE, and SE, using IDEA consensus and updated guidelines. We performed a prospective diagnostic accuracy study at a tertiary endometriosis referral centre. The index test was TVS, reported in accordance with IDEA consensus and laparoscopy as the reference standard, conducted by the same surgeon sonologist. SE and DE were defined according to the novel classification guidelines as the presence or absence of infiltration. Accuracy (Acc), sensitivity (Sens), specificity (Spec), positive and negative predictive values (PPV/NPV) were calculated for each phenotype and site relative to the reference standard. 125 participants were included. Diagnostic performance of TVS in DE: Acc 92.7 - 99.2%, Sens 82.3 - 100%, Spec 97.0 - 100%, PPV 94.1 - 100%, NPV 88.9 - 100%. For OE of the left and right ovary, respectively, was: Acc 98.3% and 98.4%, Sens 95.0% and 94.9%, Spec 100% and 100%, PPV 100% and 100%, NPV 97.6% and 97.7%. SE assessment in the population excluding DE, OE, and POD obliteration showed: Acc 73.9 - 87.0%, Sens 12.5 - 54.9%, Spec 100%, PPV 100%, NPV 72.2 - 84.6%. TVS demonstrates strong diagnostic performance for DE and OE across anatomical sites. While diagnosing SE is challenging, TVS exhibits strong specificity. These findings support TVS as a primary diagnostic for DE and OE, with enhanced accuracy. However, novel diagnostics are needed to confidently rule out SE, reducing diagnostic delay and improving surgical planning.

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 64(S1)
McMaster University (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.