EP04.02: Fetal brain imaging in 3D: a direct comparison between same day MRI and ultrasound volumetric measures

Fetal brain structures appear radically different when imaged using ultrasound (US) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Using same-day US and MRI we investigated differences in volume measurements derived from each modality. We used 110 same-day MRI and US scans, from singleton pregnancies scanned between 18 and 27 gestational weeks, from the iFIND2 study. Modality-specific deep learning pipelines were used to segment each scan into 8 regions (see figure 1a). Poor quality segmentations were rejected through manual inspection, resulting in 93 paired scans. The volume measurements were found to strongly agree between the two modalities, except brain stem (BS), intracranial volume (ICV), cortical plate (CP) (see figure 1b). Differences in BS volume was expected, as MRI scans contain a larger proportion of the structure (see figure 1a). The volume measurements between the two modalities were found to correlate significantly (p < 0.001) for all structures except the ventricular system (see figure 1c). The growth trajectories of most brain structures were found to be consistent between the two modalities. However, the derived volume measurements from ICV, CP, thalamus and white/deep grey matter were larger in US, likely due to how each modality interacts with soft tissue boundaries. This shows that volume measurements derived from one modality cannot always be directly compared to the other without adjusting for the differences in image acquisition. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28091
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EP04.02: Fetal brain imaging in 3D: a direct comparison between same day MRI and ultrasound volumetric measures

Jacqueline Matthew, L. Venturini, M.K. Wyburd, A. Namburete et al.
2 citations
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
2.22
article

EP04.02: Fetal brain imaging in 3D: a direct comparison between same day MRI and ultrasound volumetric measures

Jacqueline Matthew, L. Venturini, M.K. Wyburd, A. Namburete, Alena Uus, Vanessa Kyriakopoulou, Lilla Zöllei, Nicola K. Dinsdale, Joseph V. Hajnal, Emily Skelton
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Fetal brain structures appear radically different when imaged using ultrasound (US) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Using same-day US and MRI we investigated differences in volume measurements derived from each modality. We used 110 same-day MRI and US scans, from singleton pregnancies scanned between 18 and 27 gestational weeks, from the iFIND2 study. Modality-specific deep learning pipelines were used to segment each scan into 8 regions (see figure 1a). Poor quality segmentations were rejected through manual inspection, resulting in 93 paired scans. The volume measurements were found to strongly agree between the two modalities, except brain stem (BS), intracranial volume (ICV), cortical plate (CP) (see figure 1b). Differences in BS volume was expected, as MRI scans contain a larger proportion of the structure (see figure 1a). The volume measurements between the two modalities were found to correlate significantly (p < 0.001) for all structures except the ventricular system (see figure 1c). The growth trajectories of most brain structures were found to be consistent between the two modalities. However, the derived volume measurements from ICV, CP, thalamus and white/deep grey matter were larger in US, likely due to how each modality interacts with soft tissue boundaries. This shows that volume measurements derived from one modality cannot always be directly compared to the other without adjusting for the differences in image acquisition. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 64(S1)
Harvard University (US), City, University of London (GB), King's College London (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging (US), Science Oxford (GB)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
2.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.