OC05.01: *Prospective validation of an end‐to‐end machine learning‐based model for the classification of adnexal masses using ultrasonography

Externally validate a machine learning (ML) model capable of classifying adnexal masses using ultrasonography against the Assessment of Different NEoplasia's in the adneXa (ADNEX) model. In this two-cohort prospective study, women with an adnexal mass underwent a transvaginal ultrasound at Imperial College Healthcare, London, UK (ICH: n = 201, 1113 images) or Asan Medical Centre, Seoul, Republic of Korea (AMC: n = 190, 472 images). Adnexal masses were classified by expert subjective assessment (SA) and the ADNEX model (10% risk of malignancy without CA-125). The reference standard was the diagnosis according to expert SA or histology (where available). The ODS model was developed and validated at ICH using deep learning (MANet) for segmentation and radiomics for classification (ridge regression and Pearson correlation). Dice surface coefficient (DICE) was used to measure segmentation performance and the area under the ROC curve (AUC), F1-score, sensitivity and specificity were used to measure classification performance. The ICH test set had a median age of 49 (IQR 37-63) and 39 malignancies (19.4%). The AMC test set had a median age of 36 (IQR 28-47) and 10 malignancies (5.3%). The segmentation model achieved a DICE score (mean ± SD) of 0.79 ± 0.2 in ICH and 0.87 ± 0.14 in the AMC test set. The ODS model had an F1 score of 0.89 (AUC 0.99), sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 99% in ICH and an F1 score of 0.83 (AUC 1.00), sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 98% in the AMC test set. ADNEX had an F1 score of 0.78 (AUC 0.92), sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 90% in ICH and an F1 score of 0.34 (AUC 0.91), sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 89% in the AMC test set. In diverse target populations the ODS model provides an end-to-end method of adnexal mass segmentation and classification, with a comparable performance to ADNEX. Further prospective external validation of the performance of the ODS model is required to increase generalisation prior to integration into clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.27748
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OC05.01: *Prospective validation of an end‐to‐end machine learning‐based model for the classification of adnexal masses using ultrasonography

D. Timmerman, M. Pikovsky, A.M. Novak, C. Kyriacou et al.
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

OC05.01: *Prospective validation of an end‐to‐end machine learning‐based model for the classification of adnexal masses using ultrasonography

D. Timmerman, M. Pikovsky, A.M. Novak, C. Kyriacou, Tom Bourne, Srdjan Saso, Luca Savelli, Andrew R. Thomson, J. Yazbek, Sughashini Murugesu, Martina Fantauzzi, C. Stalder, M. Al‐Memar, N. Parker, Jennifer Frances Barcroft, C. Landolfo, Jan L. Posma, Nicole Cooper, Nishat Bharwani, Maria Munaretto, Kristofer Linton‐Reid, Eric O. Aboagye, Soo‐Youn Lee, J Kim
article en

Abstract

Externally validate a machine learning (ML) model capable of classifying adnexal masses using ultrasonography against the Assessment of Different NEoplasia's in the adneXa (ADNEX) model. In this two-cohort prospective study, women with an adnexal mass underwent a transvaginal ultrasound at Imperial College Healthcare, London, UK (ICH: n = 201, 1113 images) or Asan Medical Centre, Seoul, Republic of Korea (AMC: n = 190, 472 images). Adnexal masses were classified by expert subjective assessment (SA) and the ADNEX model (10% risk of malignancy without CA-125). The reference standard was the diagnosis according to expert SA or histology (where available). The ODS model was developed and validated at ICH using deep learning (MANet) for segmentation and radiomics for classification (ridge regression and Pearson correlation). Dice surface coefficient (DICE) was used to measure segmentation performance and the area under the ROC curve (AUC), F1-score, sensitivity and specificity were used to measure classification performance. The ICH test set had a median age of 49 (IQR 37-63) and 39 malignancies (19.4%). The AMC test set had a median age of 36 (IQR 28-47) and 10 malignancies (5.3%). The segmentation model achieved a DICE score (mean ± SD) of 0.79 ± 0.2 in ICH and 0.87 ± 0.14 in the AMC test set. The ODS model had an F1 score of 0.89 (AUC 0.99), sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 99% in ICH and an F1 score of 0.83 (AUC 1.00), sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 98% in the AMC test set. ADNEX had an F1 score of 0.78 (AUC 0.92), sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 90% in ICH and an F1 score of 0.34 (AUC 0.91), sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 89% in the AMC test set. In diverse target populations the ODS model provides an end-to-end method of adnexal mass segmentation and classification, with a comparable performance to ADNEX. Further prospective external validation of the performance of the ODS model is required to increase generalisation prior to integration into clinical practice.

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 64(S1)
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB), Asan Medical Center (KR), Ospedale G.B. Morgagni - L.Pierantoni (IT), Imperial College London (GB), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.