OC04.03: Preoperative assessment of non‐resectability in ovarian cancer according to ESGO criteria: a prospective multicentre study using imaging (ISAAC study)
The aim of the study was to test the non-inferiority of abdominopelvic ultrasound compared to computed tomography (CT) and whole-body diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (WB-DWI/MRI) in prediction of surgical outcome in patients with tubo-ovarian cancer. This is a multicentric prospective study (ISAAC study, Imaging Study on Advanced ovArian Cancer) conducted between 2018 and 2022 in five European gynecological oncology centres. Patients with suspected tubo-ovarian cancer planned for surgery underwent preoperative prediction of non-resectability with ultrasound, CT and WB-DWI/MRI. The prediction of non-resectability was based on the European Society of Gynecologic Oncology (ESGO) criteria of non-resectability. Findings were compared to the reference standard (surgical outcome). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to assess the performance of the methods in predicting non-resectability was reported. Concordance between ultrasound, CT and WB-DWI/MRI and intraoperative parameters was calculated using Cohen's kappa. Data of 242 patients were analysed, all 3 imaging methods were performed in 182. Performance was calculated in a cohort of 167 patients. The AUC was 0.83 for ultrasound, 0.75 for CT, 0.72 for WB-DWI/MRI and 0.95 for explorative surgery. Ultrasound was non-inferior to CT (p = 0.006) and MRI (p < 0.001) in the prediction of non-resectability using ESGO criteria. Agreement between ultrasound and surgical findings had the highest Cohen's κ for all ESGO criteria (ranging from 0.67 to -0.011), but it was good only for one parameter (mesenteric root). The agreement between CT and surgical findings and between WB-DWI/MRI and surgical findings were poor to fair for all parameters. Ultrasound is not inferior to CT and WB-DWI/MRI in predicting the non-resectability in patients with tubo-ovarian cancer when performed by experienced examiners.
Authors
- A. C. Testa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2217-8726)
- Giacomo Avesani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9926-760X)
- D. Fischerová (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7224-3218)
- M. Arraiza (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4014-4776)
- F. Moro (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5070-7245)
- Roman Kocián (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5896-4158)
- Jiří Jarkovský (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1400-0111)
- Paola Pricolo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5081-5628)
- Andrea Burgetová (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9975-2338)
- Ailyn Mariela Vidal Urbinati (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8656-3098)
- Patrícia Pinto (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6459-8529)
- F. Raspagliesi
- D. Franchi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3950-5538)
- F. Frühauf
- David Cibula (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6387-9356)
- Lukáš Lambert (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2299-4707)
- J Sláma (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3827-1204)
- Anna Fagotti
- Valentina Chiappa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1811-209X)
- Sarah Alessi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9517-4203)
- Camilla Panico (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0472-1118)
- G. Calareso
- Giovanni Scambia (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2758-1063)
- Martin Mašek (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1513-9358)
- Klára Benešová (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3043-1533)
- D. Altmanova
- J. Alcazar
- R. Vigorito
Institutions
- Charles University (CZ)
- Masaryk University (CZ)
- Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT)
- Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil (PT)
- Hospital Quirónsalud Barcelona (ES)
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra (ES)
- Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT)
- General University Hospital in Prague (CZ)
- European Institute of Oncology (IT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Published
- 2024-09-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.27744
- Primary Topic
- Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00