EP06.39: Prenatal contralateral pulmonary artery diameter is the best prediction of the hernia size in congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Thoracoscopic repair is one option in cases with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) in neonate, however it is difficult to estimate whether the thoracoscopic repair is successful because there are no ways to measure the defect size. Our object of this study was to evaluate the defect size of CDH neonates from the prenatal ultrasound parameters. The data was retrospectively collected between 2016 and 2023, in terms of the demographics, prenatal ultrasound and intraoperative status. The defect size was divided into two groups (more (M) or less (L) 50% of all diaphragms). Ultrasound parameters were evaluated as follows; contralateral pulmonary arterial diameter (mm), observed/expected lung area to head circumference ratio (o/e LHR), pulmonary arterial Doppler in contralateral PA (acceleration time to ejection time ratio=AT/ET), pulsatility index (PI). Twenty-eight cases of prenatally diagnosed CDH were born during the study period, two of which did not result in surgery and died, and two were right-sided CDH. There were 8 cases in which the defect size was > 50%, and all eventually needed open surgery. Contralateral PA size was significantly smaller in group M (p = 0.0002). o/e LHR was also significantly smaller in group M (p = 0.046). There was a trend of higher AT/ET ratio in group M (p = 0.080), but there was no trend in PA PI. Prenatal contralateral pulmonary artery size might be helpful to evaluate the defect size in neonatal left-sided CDH.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28211
Primary Topic
Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EP06.39: Prenatal contralateral pulmonary artery diameter is the best prediction of the hernia size in congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Akemi Itakura, Nana Matsuzawa, Yuichiro Ishida, Yuka Yamamoto
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies
article

EP06.39: Prenatal contralateral pulmonary artery diameter is the best prediction of the hernia size in congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Akemi Itakura, Nana Matsuzawa, Yuichiro Ishida, Yuka Yamamoto
article en

Abstract

Thoracoscopic repair is one option in cases with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) in neonate, however it is difficult to estimate whether the thoracoscopic repair is successful because there are no ways to measure the defect size. Our object of this study was to evaluate the defect size of CDH neonates from the prenatal ultrasound parameters. The data was retrospectively collected between 2016 and 2023, in terms of the demographics, prenatal ultrasound and intraoperative status. The defect size was divided into two groups (more (M) or less (L) 50% of all diaphragms). Ultrasound parameters were evaluated as follows; contralateral pulmonary arterial diameter (mm), observed/expected lung area to head circumference ratio (o/e LHR), pulmonary arterial Doppler in contralateral PA (acceleration time to ejection time ratio=AT/ET), pulsatility index (PI). Twenty-eight cases of prenatally diagnosed CDH were born during the study period, two of which did not result in surgery and died, and two were right-sided CDH. There were 8 cases in which the defect size was > 50%, and all eventually needed open surgery. Contralateral PA size was significantly smaller in group M (p = 0.0002). o/e LHR was also significantly smaller in group M (p = 0.046). There was a trend of higher AT/ET ratio in group M (p = 0.080), but there was no trend in PA PI. Prenatal contralateral pulmonary artery size might be helpful to evaluate the defect size in neonatal left-sided CDH.

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 64(S1)
Juntendo University (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.