EP01.41: Performance of an AI software in automatic detection of quality criteria and characteristics on fetal ultrasound images

Practitioners practicing fetal ultrasound (US) exams can nowadays be supported by artificial intelligence (AI) software (under development, not approved) evaluating images captured during routine clinical practice. The objective was to assess the performance of an AI software for fetal US exams, by automatic detection of anatomical structures and characteristics. 643 fetal US exams, performed in all trimesters (T1, T2, T3), were collected from 36 North-American and European centres. The sensitivity and specificity of the AI software (see table 1) were assessed by comparing the algorithm's blinded assessment to experts' assessment. The concordances between experts' and the algorithm's assessments for the presence (resp. absence) of an anatomical structure or characteristic was defined as true positive (resp. true negative) on the corresponding structure or characteristic. Reported in table 1. With proven high performance, such an AI software appears relevant in supporting fetal US practitioners by providing live automatic objective evaluation of captured images supporting quality assessment procedures. Specificity - Mean (95% CI) Transthalamic Transventricular Transcerebellar 4 chambers LVOT RVOT 3VV or 3VT Abdominal Circumference Axial view of the kidneys Crown–rump Length Nuchal Translucency Profile Placenta insertion Placenta location

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28055
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EP01.41: Performance of an AI software in automatic detection of quality criteria and characteristics on fetal ultrasound images

Labib Ghulmiyyah, C. Amabile, Emmanuel Spaggiari, C.M. Snell et al.
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Medical Imaging and Analysis
article

EP01.41: Performance of an AI software in automatic detection of quality criteria and characteristics on fetal ultrasound images

Labib Ghulmiyyah, C. Amabile, Emmanuel Spaggiari, C.M. Snell, Vianney Debavelaere, Frédéric Logé, N. Fries, K. R. Faulk, Vivian Romero, Y. Ville, Guillaume Corda-D’Incan, Michail Spiliopoulos, Miguel Márquez, J. Stirnemann, N. Matevski
article en

Abstract

Practitioners practicing fetal ultrasound (US) exams can nowadays be supported by artificial intelligence (AI) software (under development, not approved) evaluating images captured during routine clinical practice. The objective was to assess the performance of an AI software for fetal US exams, by automatic detection of anatomical structures and characteristics. 643 fetal US exams, performed in all trimesters (T1, T2, T3), were collected from 36 North-American and European centres. The sensitivity and specificity of the AI software (see table 1) were assessed by comparing the algorithm's blinded assessment to experts' assessment. The concordances between experts' and the algorithm's assessments for the presence (resp. absence) of an anatomical structure or characteristic was defined as true positive (resp. true negative) on the corresponding structure or characteristic. Reported in table 1. With proven high performance, such an AI software appears relevant in supporting fetal US practitioners by providing live automatic objective evaluation of captured images supporting quality assessment procedures. Specificity - Mean (95% CI) Transthalamic Transventricular Transcerebellar 4 chambers LVOT RVOT 3VV or 3VT Abdominal Circumference Axial view of the kidneys Crown–rump Length Nuchal Translucency Profile Placenta insertion Placenta location

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 64(S1)
Délégation Paris 5 (FR), Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Hughston Clinic (US), Atrium Medical Cente (US), Broward Health Medical Center (US), Women’s Health Care (US), Memorial Hospital (US), Broward Health (US), Corewell Health, Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Medical Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.