EP23.14: Diagnostic accuracy of adnexal malignancy assessment models ADNEX and simple rules when applied by individuals with no prior clinical experience

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of two models, IOTA ADNEX and Simple Rules (SR), in differentiating between benign and malignant pathology in known adnexal masses when applied by healthcare workers without prior clinical experience in sonography or assessment of adnexal masses. This meta-analysis used the MEDLINE database to find primary articles which compared various models of assessing adnexal masses for malignancy. 520 articles were investigated for adnexal masses which were assessed by healthcare workers without prior clinical experience in sonography. Only studies which utilised ADNEX or SR and were confirmed by experienced pathologists postoperatively were included. 7 articles totalling 1,598 adnexal masses met inclusion criteria. Ultrasound classification was used as test outcomes and postoperative as true outcomes. The cutoff value for malignancy using ADNEX was 0.10 for all masses. Masses that did not fit into either category (benign or malignant) using SR were not included in the final assessment. The diagnostic accuracy of the SR method was found to be significantly higher than that of ADNEX with values of 93.1% and 88.8% respectively (p = 0.002). SR also outperformed ADNEX in specificity with values of 93.5% and 72.3% respectively (p < 0.001). There was a slight decrease in SR in sensitivity at 91.4% compared to 95.1%, although this difference was not significant (p = 0.056). Simple rules has superior accuracy to the more recently developed ADNEX model when applied by examiners with no prior experience in adnexal tumour malignancy assessment using sonography. These findings suggest that the ADNEX model requires more experience before reviewers can accurately diagnose malignancy. In situations where expert sonographers are unavailable, less experienced healthcare professionals may consider using SR to assess adnexal masses. It is proposed that future research targets the level of competency required to more accurately assess for malignancy using ADNEX.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28950
Primary Topic
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EP23.14: Diagnostic accuracy of adnexal malignancy assessment models ADNEX and simple rules when applied by individuals with no prior clinical experience

G. Ghanadan
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
article

EP23.14: Diagnostic accuracy of adnexal malignancy assessment models ADNEX and simple rules when applied by individuals with no prior clinical experience

G. Ghanadan
article en

Abstract

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of two models, IOTA ADNEX and Simple Rules (SR), in differentiating between benign and malignant pathology in known adnexal masses when applied by healthcare workers without prior clinical experience in sonography or assessment of adnexal masses. This meta-analysis used the MEDLINE database to find primary articles which compared various models of assessing adnexal masses for malignancy. 520 articles were investigated for adnexal masses which were assessed by healthcare workers without prior clinical experience in sonography. Only studies which utilised ADNEX or SR and were confirmed by experienced pathologists postoperatively were included. 7 articles totalling 1,598 adnexal masses met inclusion criteria. Ultrasound classification was used as test outcomes and postoperative as true outcomes. The cutoff value for malignancy using ADNEX was 0.10 for all masses. Masses that did not fit into either category (benign or malignant) using SR were not included in the final assessment. The diagnostic accuracy of the SR method was found to be significantly higher than that of ADNEX with values of 93.1% and 88.8% respectively (p = 0.002). SR also outperformed ADNEX in specificity with values of 93.5% and 72.3% respectively (p < 0.001). There was a slight decrease in SR in sensitivity at 91.4% compared to 95.1%, although this difference was not significant (p = 0.056). Simple rules has superior accuracy to the more recently developed ADNEX model when applied by examiners with no prior experience in adnexal tumour malignancy assessment using sonography. These findings suggest that the ADNEX model requires more experience before reviewers can accurately diagnose malignancy. In situations where expert sonographers are unavailable, less experienced healthcare professionals may consider using SR to assess adnexal masses. It is proposed that future research targets the level of competency required to more accurately assess for malignancy using ADNEX.

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 64(S1)
Georgetown University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.