OC20.05: A randomised controlled trial in China: microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for fetal reduction in monochorionic twin pregnancies

Using a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial to compare the safety and efficacy of microwave ablation (MWA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in selective reduction of complex monochorionic twin pregnancies. This was a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial conducted from May 2019 to August 2021 at the Third Hospital of Peking University. Twin pregnant women with complex monochorionic requiring selective reduction were recruited, and were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio either through MWA or RFA. Senior obstetrician performed all the operations, with the trial protocol having been published (Xie J, et al. BMJ Open 2020). We compared the preterm birth rate, fetal mortality rate, and overall survival rate at 28 days postpartum, and evaluated the neurodevelopment of surviving children at 6 months. The study was approved by the ethical review committee of the Peking University Third Hospital, and was registered at Clinical Trials gov (NCT04014452). In this study, consent was obtained from 144 women, with 72 undergoing RFA and the remaining undergoing MWA. The preoperative characteristics and surgical procedures were comparably similar, with the notable exception of ablation power, which was remarkably higher in the RFA group (35 vs. 30; P = 0.0216). Despite this, the overall survival rates were closely matched (73.61% for RFA vs. 69.44% for MWA; P = 0.5796), with the RFA group reporting 19 deaths and MWA group 22 deaths. Neonatal outcomes showed no significant differences. Following up on 103 surviving children, 31 were lost to follow-up (30.1% loss rate). Nonetheless, 72 survivors yielded valid results, with no significant differences in developmental delay rates nor any brain injury observed in subsequent visits. RFA and MWA for complex monochorionic pregnancies can achieve similar overall survival rate, neonatal outcomes and developmental state, and their results may provide evidence for the extensive use of MWA in intrauterine surgeries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.27864
Primary Topic
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OC20.05: A randomised controlled trial in China: microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for fetal reduction in monochorionic twin pregnancies

Yuhu Zhai, Ying Zhao, Tao Wu, Wei Yuan
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
article

OC20.05: A randomised controlled trial in China: microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for fetal reduction in monochorionic twin pregnancies

Yuhu Zhai, Ying Zhao, Tao Wu, Wei Yuan
article en

Abstract

Using a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial to compare the safety and efficacy of microwave ablation (MWA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in selective reduction of complex monochorionic twin pregnancies. This was a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial conducted from May 2019 to August 2021 at the Third Hospital of Peking University. Twin pregnant women with complex monochorionic requiring selective reduction were recruited, and were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio either through MWA or RFA. Senior obstetrician performed all the operations, with the trial protocol having been published (Xie J, et al. BMJ Open 2020). We compared the preterm birth rate, fetal mortality rate, and overall survival rate at 28 days postpartum, and evaluated the neurodevelopment of surviving children at 6 months. The study was approved by the ethical review committee of the Peking University Third Hospital, and was registered at Clinical Trials gov (NCT04014452). In this study, consent was obtained from 144 women, with 72 undergoing RFA and the remaining undergoing MWA. The preoperative characteristics and surgical procedures were comparably similar, with the notable exception of ablation power, which was remarkably higher in the RFA group (35 vs. 30; P = 0.0216). Despite this, the overall survival rates were closely matched (73.61% for RFA vs. 69.44% for MWA; P = 0.5796), with the RFA group reporting 19 deaths and MWA group 22 deaths. Neonatal outcomes showed no significant differences. Following up on 103 surviving children, 31 were lost to follow-up (30.1% loss rate). Nonetheless, 72 survivors yielded valid results, with no significant differences in developmental delay rates nor any brain injury observed in subsequent visits. RFA and MWA for complex monochorionic pregnancies can achieve similar overall survival rate, neonatal outcomes and developmental state, and their results may provide evidence for the extensive use of MWA in intrauterine surgeries.

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 64(S1)
Peking University (CN), Peking University Third Hospital (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.