OC20.01: Twin versus singleton growth charts in the diagnosis of small for gestational age in twin pregnancy: systematic review and meta‐analysis

When singleton charts are used to assess fetal growth in twins, a high proportion of fetuses are diagnosed as SGA, but whether this approach is a good predictor of adverse outcomes is controversial. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the perinatal outcomes of SGA twins diagnosed with singleton or twin charts. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus and the Web of Science were searched up to October 2023. Studies including twin pregnancies assessed with both singleton and twin charts of estimated fetal weight for diagnosis of SGA were included. We performed a random-effect meta-analysis of proportion of perinatal outcomes: we compared SGA fetuses diagnosed with twin versus singleton charts and SGA diagnosed with singleton charts versus non-SGA diagnosed with twin charts. Four studies including 13623 twins were included. The rate of SGA diagnosed with singleton charts was 32.5%, whereas twin charts classified 5.5% of twins as SGA. In the group of SGA defined using twin charts, the rate of composite adverse neonatal outcomes was significantly higher than in the group of singleton charts (OR 3.24, 95% CI 1.62-6.49). Other perinatal outcomes showed the same trend: NICU admission (OR 2.95 95% CI 1.30-6.68), RDS (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.69-2.82), neonatal sepsis (OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.83-3.56), neonatal mortality (OR 4.03, 95% CI 2.46-6.60). When we compared all outcomes between SGA fetuses diagnosed with singleton charts and non-SGA fetuses classified using the twin charts, no significant differences were noted between the two groups in terms of neonatal morbidity and mortality (p>0.05 for all). Twin charts are more specific than singleton charts in identifying SGA at higher risk of adverse outcomes. The outcomes of cases not classified as SGA with twin charts did not differ from SGA fetuses diagnosed with singletons. Large prospective studies are needed to investigate the most accurate method for growth assessment and prediction of adverse outcomes in twins.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.27860
Primary Topic
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OC20.01: Twin versus singleton growth charts in the diagnosis of small for gestational age in twin pregnancy: systematic review and meta‐analysis

Fabrizio Zullo, A. Giancotti, Giuseppe Rizzo, A. Khalil et al.
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
article

OC20.01: Twin versus singleton growth charts in the diagnosis of small for gestational age in twin pregnancy: systematic review and meta‐analysis

Fabrizio Zullo, A. Giancotti, Giuseppe Rizzo, A. Khalil, Elena D’Alberti, Valentina D’Ambrosio, Salvatore Sorrenti, Daniele Di Mascio
article en

Abstract

When singleton charts are used to assess fetal growth in twins, a high proportion of fetuses are diagnosed as SGA, but whether this approach is a good predictor of adverse outcomes is controversial. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the perinatal outcomes of SGA twins diagnosed with singleton or twin charts. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus and the Web of Science were searched up to October 2023. Studies including twin pregnancies assessed with both singleton and twin charts of estimated fetal weight for diagnosis of SGA were included. We performed a random-effect meta-analysis of proportion of perinatal outcomes: we compared SGA fetuses diagnosed with twin versus singleton charts and SGA diagnosed with singleton charts versus non-SGA diagnosed with twin charts. Four studies including 13623 twins were included. The rate of SGA diagnosed with singleton charts was 32.5%, whereas twin charts classified 5.5% of twins as SGA. In the group of SGA defined using twin charts, the rate of composite adverse neonatal outcomes was significantly higher than in the group of singleton charts (OR 3.24, 95% CI 1.62-6.49). Other perinatal outcomes showed the same trend: NICU admission (OR 2.95 95% CI 1.30-6.68), RDS (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.69-2.82), neonatal sepsis (OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.83-3.56), neonatal mortality (OR 4.03, 95% CI 2.46-6.60). When we compared all outcomes between SGA fetuses diagnosed with singleton charts and non-SGA fetuses classified using the twin charts, no significant differences were noted between the two groups in terms of neonatal morbidity and mortality (p>0.05 for all). Twin charts are more specific than singleton charts in identifying SGA at higher risk of adverse outcomes. The outcomes of cases not classified as SGA with twin charts did not differ from SGA fetuses diagnosed with singletons. Large prospective studies are needed to investigate the most accurate method for growth assessment and prediction of adverse outcomes in twins.

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 64(S1)
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), University of London (GB), University of Liverpool (GB), St George's, University of London (GB), Policlinico Umberto I (IT), Liverpool Womens NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.