OP08.09: Operative technical complications during fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion for congenital diaphragmatic hernia

To describe the frequency of technical complications during fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion (FETO) for fetuses with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). A retrospective cohort study was conducted among consecutive fetuses with left-sided CDH treated with FETO in a single fetal surgery centre in Mexico from January 2012 to February 2024. The types, incidence and related factors of operative technical complications during FETO were analysed. Eighty-one CDH fetuses treated with FETO were included. Endotracheal placement of the balloon was performed successfully in all cases at a mean GA of 29.6 (SD 1.3). Access into the fetal trachea was achieved in the first attempt in up to 88.8%. Twelve (14.8%) cases showed operative technical complications during FETO. Fetoscope dislodgement out of the trachea before balloon deployment in 5 (6.2%), internal version of the fetal presentation during tracheoscopy in 3 (3.7%), rupture of the catheter during balloon detachment in 2 cases (2.5%), balloon rupture in 1 (1.2%), need to re-position the fetoscope by re-entering the uterine cavity in 1 (1.2%). FETO may be feasible in all cases but intraoperative technical complications can be expected in up to 15% of them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.27941
Primary Topic
Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OP08.09: Operative technical complications during fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion for congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Antonio Márquez, S. Gil Pugliese, Rogelio Cruz-Martínez, O. Salazar‐Rengifo et al.
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies
article

OP08.09: Operative technical complications during fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion for congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Antonio Márquez, S. Gil Pugliese, Rogelio Cruz-Martínez, O. Salazar‐Rengifo, A. Peláez‐Jiménez, M. Martínez‐Rodríguez
article en

Abstract

To describe the frequency of technical complications during fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion (FETO) for fetuses with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). A retrospective cohort study was conducted among consecutive fetuses with left-sided CDH treated with FETO in a single fetal surgery centre in Mexico from January 2012 to February 2024. The types, incidence and related factors of operative technical complications during FETO were analysed. Eighty-one CDH fetuses treated with FETO were included. Endotracheal placement of the balloon was performed successfully in all cases at a mean GA of 29.6 (SD 1.3). Access into the fetal trachea was achieved in the first attempt in up to 88.8%. Twelve (14.8%) cases showed operative technical complications during FETO. Fetoscope dislodgement out of the trachea before balloon deployment in 5 (6.2%), internal version of the fetal presentation during tracheoscopy in 3 (3.7%), rupture of the catheter during balloon detachment in 2 cases (2.5%), balloon rupture in 1 (1.2%), need to re-position the fetoscope by re-entering the uterine cavity in 1 (1.2%). FETO may be feasible in all cases but intraoperative technical complications can be expected in up to 15% of them.

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 64(S1)
Hospital Privado (AR)
Università Degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emila, Universität Wien, Medizinische Universität Wien, Università di Bologna, Fundació Institut de Recerca Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, St. George's, University of London, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.