PERBANDINGAN PELAKSANAAN FUNGSI LEGISLASI ANTARA DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT DI INDONESIA DAN REPRESENTATIVES DI URUGUAY

A democratic state is characterized by the sovereignty of the people, where the highest power lies with the citizens. One manifestation of this sovereignty is the role of representative bodies in the legislative process. This study examines the role of the Indonesian House of Representatives and the Representatives in Uruguay in the law-making process, and evaluates their legislative performance. The research employs normative legal methodology, with descriptive writing, and uses secondary data. The result and Conclusions are drawn using deductive logic. The study finds that the Indonesian House of Representatives has a national legislative program that includes draft laws, while the Representatives in Uruguay do not have such a program. In Indonesia, 24 out of 247 draft laws in the 2020-2024 period were successfully enacted, whereas in Uruguay, 412 draft laws were passed into law during the same period.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25105/refor.v6i3.21180
Primary Topic
Indonesian Election Politics and Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PERBANDINGAN PELAKSANAAN FUNGSI LEGISLASI ANTARA DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT DI INDONESIA DAN REPRESENTATIVES DI URUGUAY

Amirul Huda Musyafa Samudra, Ninuk Wijiningsih
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Indonesian Election Politics and Participation
article

PERBANDINGAN PELAKSANAAN FUNGSI LEGISLASI ANTARA DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT DI INDONESIA DAN REPRESENTATIVES DI URUGUAY

Amirul Huda Musyafa Samudra, Ninuk Wijiningsih
article en

Abstract

A democratic state is characterized by the sovereignty of the people, where the highest power lies with the citizens. One manifestation of this sovereignty is the role of representative bodies in the legislative process. This study examines the role of the Indonesian House of Representatives and the Representatives in Uruguay in the law-making process, and evaluates their legislative performance. The research employs normative legal methodology, with descriptive writing, and uses secondary data. The result and Conclusions are drawn using deductive logic. The study finds that the Indonesian House of Representatives has a national legislative program that includes draft laws, while the Representatives in Uruguay do not have such a program. In Indonesia, 24 out of 247 draft laws in the 2020-2024 period were successfully enacted, whereas in Uruguay, 412 draft laws were passed into law during the same period.

Reformasi Hukum TrisaktiVol. 6(3)
Universitas Trisakti (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Indonesian Election Politics and Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

PERBANDINGAN PELAKSANAAN FUNGSI LEGISLASI ANTARA DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT DI INDONESIA DAN REPRESENTATIVES DI URUGUAY — Amirul Huda Musyafa Samudra, Ninuk Wijiningsih · Reformasi Hukum Trisakti (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS