ANALISIS PENERAPAN SANKSI PIDANA TERHADAP MILITER YANG MELAKUKAN TINDAK PIDANA PERKOSAAN (PUTUSAN NOMOR: 35-K/PM III-17/AD/II/2022)

The analysis examines the criminal sanctions applied to a military officer convicted of rape in Decision No. 35-K/PM III-17/AD/II/2022. Under Article 285 of the Criminal Code, rape is a severe crime, and military personnel may face sanctions under the Criminal Code if their actions are not specifically addressed by military law. The research addresses two main issues: 1) Whether the criminal sanctions in this decision are consistent with Article 285, and 2) How criminal sanctions should be aggravated for a military officer found guilty of rape in this case. This normative juridical research, using descriptive analysis, concludes that the sanctions in Decision No. 35-K/PM III-17/AD/II/2022 do not align with Article 285. The judge should have imposed harsher penalties, taking into account the severity of the offense. The aggravation of criminal sanctions should have been guided by Article 52 of the Criminal Code, allowing for an increase of one-third of the original penalty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25105/refor.v6i3.21249
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ANALISIS PENERAPAN SANKSI PIDANA TERHADAP MILITER YANG MELAKUKAN TINDAK PIDANA PERKOSAAN (PUTUSAN NOMOR: 35-K/PM III-17/AD/II/2022)

Aprima Suar, Jenifi Plona Makienggung
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Legal Studies and Policies
article

ANALISIS PENERAPAN SANKSI PIDANA TERHADAP MILITER YANG MELAKUKAN TINDAK PIDANA PERKOSAAN (PUTUSAN NOMOR: 35-K/PM III-17/AD/II/2022)

Aprima Suar, Jenifi Plona Makienggung
article en

Abstract

The analysis examines the criminal sanctions applied to a military officer convicted of rape in Decision No. 35-K/PM III-17/AD/II/2022. Under Article 285 of the Criminal Code, rape is a severe crime, and military personnel may face sanctions under the Criminal Code if their actions are not specifically addressed by military law. The research addresses two main issues: 1) Whether the criminal sanctions in this decision are consistent with Article 285, and 2) How criminal sanctions should be aggravated for a military officer found guilty of rape in this case. This normative juridical research, using descriptive analysis, concludes that the sanctions in Decision No. 35-K/PM III-17/AD/II/2022 do not align with Article 285. The judge should have imposed harsher penalties, taking into account the severity of the offense. The aggravation of criminal sanctions should have been guided by Article 52 of the Criminal Code, allowing for an increase of one-third of the original penalty.

Reformasi Hukum TrisaktiVol. 6(3)
Universitas Trisakti (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.