<b>PELAKSANAAN PENJATUHAN SANKSI ADMINISTRASI TERHADAP PEGAWAI NEGERI SIPIL YANG MELAKUKAN TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN</b>

State Civil Apparatus assist in carrying out the government's duties to achieve Indonesia's national goals. However, issues arise when a Civil Servant is dismissed for actions detrimental to the state. This research addresses two main questions: whether the administrative sanctions were imposed in accordance with statutory regulations, and whether they complied with Law Number 5 of 2014 concerning State Civil Apparatus. The research method is qualitative, employing normative legal research. The findings reveal that the dismissal decree was not based on appropriate legislation, as the Plaintiff had pursued a legal remedy through cassation. However, the sanctions were in accordance with Law Number 5 of 2014, as the Plaintiff was found guilty of fraud and sentenced to 2 years and 8 months in prison. The conclusion is that the Defendant erred in their consideration of the administrative sanction, basing it on the Bengkulu District and High Courts' decisions, which had not yet gained permanent legal force. Thus, the dismissal is deemed invalid

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25105/refor.v6i3.20166
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PELAKSANAAN PENJATUHAN SANKSI ADMINISTRASI TERHADAP PEGAWAI NEGERI SIPIL YANG MELAKUKAN TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN

Yogo Pamungkas, Muhammad Syukur Fezadi Iskandar
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Legal Studies and Policies
article

PELAKSANAAN PENJATUHAN SANKSI ADMINISTRASI TERHADAP PEGAWAI NEGERI SIPIL YANG MELAKUKAN TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN

Yogo Pamungkas, Muhammad Syukur Fezadi Iskandar
article en

Abstract

State Civil Apparatus assist in carrying out the government's duties to achieve Indonesia's national goals. However, issues arise when a Civil Servant is dismissed for actions detrimental to the state. This research addresses two main questions: whether the administrative sanctions were imposed in accordance with statutory regulations, and whether they complied with Law Number 5 of 2014 concerning State Civil Apparatus. The research method is qualitative, employing normative legal research. The findings reveal that the dismissal decree was not based on appropriate legislation, as the Plaintiff had pursued a legal remedy through cassation. However, the sanctions were in accordance with Law Number 5 of 2014, as the Plaintiff was found guilty of fraud and sentenced to 2 years and 8 months in prison. The conclusion is that the Defendant erred in their consideration of the administrative sanction, basing it on the Bengkulu District and High Courts' decisions, which had not yet gained permanent legal force. Thus, the dismissal is deemed invalid

Reformasi Hukum TrisaktiVol. 6(3)
Universitas Trisakti (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

<b>PELAKSANAAN PENJATUHAN SANKSI ADMINISTRASI TERHADAP PEGAWAI NEGERI SIPIL YANG MELAKUKAN TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN</b> — Yogo Pamungkas, Muhammad Syukur Fezadi Iskandar · Reformasi Hukum Trisakti (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS