OP05.08: The introduction of a fetal growth decision‐tool to improve consistency in management of ultrasound findings in late pregnancy

Aim: To introduce an algorithm to increase consistency of decisions made following growth scans. A retrospective cohort in a UK tertiary unit (2018-2019) to compare pre (n = 53) and postadherence (n = 60) to the ‘small for gestational age’ (SGA) guideline. Inclusion criteria: singleton pregnancies, morphologically normal, >34 weeks. The output from the tool uses biometry and the ratio of Middle Cerebral Artery (MCA) Pulsatility Index to Umbilical Artery (UA)-PI to calculate the Cerebral Placental Ration (CPR) multiples of the median (MoM). CPR MoM < 5th centile (0.67) is used as a threshold. Prior to tool introduction, clinicians interpreted a written guideline describing growth parameters and Doppler readings and acted upon these. After introduction, an algorithm output was used (see figure 1). Prior to introduction of the tool, there was a scan rate of 0.53 (5483 births, 2896 growth scans) which increased in 2019 to 0.57 per birth (5351 births, 3048 growth scans). Scan outcomes were equivalent (normal growth/Doppler 81 (80%) vs 45 (76%), biometry >95thcentile (6 (6%) vs 8 (14%), growth tailing 6 (6%) vs 3 (5%), polyhydramnios 4 (4%) vs 1 (2%), inconclusive 2 (2%) vs 1 (2%). There was an increase in the adherence to the guideline from 94% to 98%. The decision aid improves adherence to guidelines and making consistent decisions. There was no reduction in the number of repeat growth scans. However, there was pressure from other indications leading to a rise in indications for and number of scans requested. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.27914
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OP05.08: The introduction of a fetal growth decision‐tool to improve consistency in management of ultrasound findings in late pregnancy

R. Parasuraman, Linden Stocker, Alexandra Kermack, Francis H. Tomlinson et al.
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

OP05.08: The introduction of a fetal growth decision‐tool to improve consistency in management of ultrasound findings in late pregnancy

R. Parasuraman, Linden Stocker, Alexandra Kermack, Francis H. Tomlinson, D.T. Howe
article en

Abstract

Aim: To introduce an algorithm to increase consistency of decisions made following growth scans. A retrospective cohort in a UK tertiary unit (2018-2019) to compare pre (n = 53) and postadherence (n = 60) to the ‘small for gestational age’ (SGA) guideline. Inclusion criteria: singleton pregnancies, morphologically normal, >34 weeks. The output from the tool uses biometry and the ratio of Middle Cerebral Artery (MCA) Pulsatility Index to Umbilical Artery (UA)-PI to calculate the Cerebral Placental Ration (CPR) multiples of the median (MoM). CPR MoM < 5th centile (0.67) is used as a threshold. Prior to tool introduction, clinicians interpreted a written guideline describing growth parameters and Doppler readings and acted upon these. After introduction, an algorithm output was used (see figure 1). Prior to introduction of the tool, there was a scan rate of 0.53 (5483 births, 2896 growth scans) which increased in 2019 to 0.57 per birth (5351 births, 3048 growth scans). Scan outcomes were equivalent (normal growth/Doppler 81 (80%) vs 45 (76%), biometry >95thcentile (6 (6%) vs 8 (14%), growth tailing 6 (6%) vs 3 (5%), polyhydramnios 4 (4%) vs 1 (2%), inconclusive 2 (2%) vs 1 (2%). There was an increase in the adherence to the guideline from 94% to 98%. The decision aid improves adherence to guidelines and making consistent decisions. There was no reduction in the number of repeat growth scans. However, there was pressure from other indications leading to a rise in indications for and number of scans requested. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 64(S1)
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Southampton (GB)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.