OP06.04: Discrimination of benign and malignant adnexal masses in daily clinical routine: external validation of ADNEX and RMI in Denmark – preliminary results

To improve the quality of clinical management of adnexal masses and compare the diagnostic efficiency of ultrasound-based risk models for clinical decision-making. In this prospective multicentre study, we implemented systematic ultrasound description according to IOTA criteria in gynecological departments in all hospitals in the Central Denmark Region. A standardised ultrasound description form (including Risk-of-Malignancy-Index (RMI) and Assessment of Different Neoplasia in the adneXa (ADNEX) model calculation) was implemented in the electronic patient file. All departments had priorly been offered IOTA-certification and had regular IOTA teaching during the project period. Patients with adnexal masses at ultrasound were consecutively included. Reference standard was histopathological diagnosis or follow-up for conservatively managed adnexal masses. Inconsistencies in ultrasound descriptions were recorded. A total of 4886 systematic ultrasound scans were performed in 1800 patients during 1.5 years in 2021-2023. At least one year follow-up were available in all patients. Median age was 58.1 (Inter Quartile Range 42.9-72.3). Overall, the Area Under the receiver operating characteristics Curve (AUC) was higher for ADNEX: 0.93 (95% Confidence Interval 0.90-0.95) compared to RMI: 0.88 (0.85-0.91) (p < 0.001) for prediction of malignancy in the first recorded ultrasound classification. Pitfalls in use of IOTA criteria were observed. This large, strictly designed prospective external validation study of IOTA criteria implemented in a regional setting suggests high and superior diagnostic performance of ADNEX compared to RMI for identification of malignancy. Notably, this was observed in a low-risk patient population by mixed-level ultrasound observers, representative of general gynecological departments. The study illustrates the feasibility and advantages of implementing IOTA terminology and predictive models in a national setting. Attention to ultrasound education is needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.27919
Primary Topic
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OP06.04: Discrimination of benign and malignant adnexal masses in daily clinical routine: external validation of ADNEX and RMI in Denmark – preliminary results

T. Van den Bosch, Ole Mogensen, Charles Møller, Bodil Hammer Bech et al.
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
article

OP06.04: Discrimination of benign and malignant adnexal masses in daily clinical routine: external validation of ADNEX and RMI in Denmark – preliminary results

T. Van den Bosch, Ole Mogensen, Charles Møller, Bodil Hammer Bech, I. Dueholm Hjorth
article en

Abstract

To improve the quality of clinical management of adnexal masses and compare the diagnostic efficiency of ultrasound-based risk models for clinical decision-making. In this prospective multicentre study, we implemented systematic ultrasound description according to IOTA criteria in gynecological departments in all hospitals in the Central Denmark Region. A standardised ultrasound description form (including Risk-of-Malignancy-Index (RMI) and Assessment of Different Neoplasia in the adneXa (ADNEX) model calculation) was implemented in the electronic patient file. All departments had priorly been offered IOTA-certification and had regular IOTA teaching during the project period. Patients with adnexal masses at ultrasound were consecutively included. Reference standard was histopathological diagnosis or follow-up for conservatively managed adnexal masses. Inconsistencies in ultrasound descriptions were recorded. A total of 4886 systematic ultrasound scans were performed in 1800 patients during 1.5 years in 2021-2023. At least one year follow-up were available in all patients. Median age was 58.1 (Inter Quartile Range 42.9-72.3). Overall, the Area Under the receiver operating characteristics Curve (AUC) was higher for ADNEX: 0.93 (95% Confidence Interval 0.90-0.95) compared to RMI: 0.88 (0.85-0.91) (p < 0.001) for prediction of malignancy in the first recorded ultrasound classification. Pitfalls in use of IOTA criteria were observed. This large, strictly designed prospective external validation study of IOTA criteria implemented in a regional setting suggests high and superior diagnostic performance of ADNEX compared to RMI for identification of malignancy. Notably, this was observed in a low-risk patient population by mixed-level ultrasound observers, representative of general gynecological departments. The study illustrates the feasibility and advantages of implementing IOTA terminology and predictive models in a national setting. Attention to ultrasound education is needed.

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 64(S1)
Aarhus University (DK), Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE), Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.