OP06.06: LR2 versus simple rules: a meta‐analysis comparing the performance of ACOG‐recommended tools for differentiating adnexal masses

To compare the sensitivities and specificities of two ultrasound models, IOTA logistic regression 2 (LR2) and simple rules (SR), in differentiating between benign and malignant pathology in known adnexal masses. This meta-analysis used the MEDLINE database to find primary articles which compared various models of evaluating adnexal masses for malignancy. To account for advances in ultrasound technology and the date of the most recent recommendation by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) for evaluating adnexal masses, the search was limited to articles published between 2016 and 2024. 204 articles were investigated by one reviewer for adnexal masses which were assessed using LR2 or SR and confirmed by postoperative pathology. Across the 20 articles which met inclusion criteria, the results of assessments for 6,413 adnexal masses were extracted and compared using ultrasound classification as test outcomes and postoperative pathology as true outcomes. The cutoff value for malignancy using LR2 was 0.10 for all masses. Masses that did not fit into either category (benign or malignant) using SR were classified as malignant. LR2 exhibited a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 84.5%. Contrastingly, SR demonstrated a sensitivity of 86.3% and a specificity of 90.5%. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences indicating SR had a higher sensitivity (p = 0.0051) and superior specificity (p < 0.0001) over LR2. These findings highlight the potential advantages of utilising SR over LR2 in the ultrasound-based evaluation of adnexal masses, particularly in achieving higher sensitivity and specificity. ACOG recommends using either LR2 or SR in patients with known adnexal mass to assess for malignancy, but our review suggests the latter may have superior performance. We propose that more research should be conducted to support our hypothesis that SR should be preferred over LR2 for adnexal mass sonography.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.27921
Primary Topic
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OP06.06: LR2 versus simple rules: a meta‐analysis comparing the performance of ACOG‐recommended tools for differentiating adnexal masses

B. Cronquist, G. Ghanadan
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
article

OP06.06: LR2 versus simple rules: a meta‐analysis comparing the performance of ACOG‐recommended tools for differentiating adnexal masses

B. Cronquist, G. Ghanadan
article en

Abstract

To compare the sensitivities and specificities of two ultrasound models, IOTA logistic regression 2 (LR2) and simple rules (SR), in differentiating between benign and malignant pathology in known adnexal masses. This meta-analysis used the MEDLINE database to find primary articles which compared various models of evaluating adnexal masses for malignancy. To account for advances in ultrasound technology and the date of the most recent recommendation by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) for evaluating adnexal masses, the search was limited to articles published between 2016 and 2024. 204 articles were investigated by one reviewer for adnexal masses which were assessed using LR2 or SR and confirmed by postoperative pathology. Across the 20 articles which met inclusion criteria, the results of assessments for 6,413 adnexal masses were extracted and compared using ultrasound classification as test outcomes and postoperative pathology as true outcomes. The cutoff value for malignancy using LR2 was 0.10 for all masses. Masses that did not fit into either category (benign or malignant) using SR were classified as malignant. LR2 exhibited a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 84.5%. Contrastingly, SR demonstrated a sensitivity of 86.3% and a specificity of 90.5%. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences indicating SR had a higher sensitivity (p = 0.0051) and superior specificity (p < 0.0001) over LR2. These findings highlight the potential advantages of utilising SR over LR2 in the ultrasound-based evaluation of adnexal masses, particularly in achieving higher sensitivity and specificity. ACOG recommends using either LR2 or SR in patients with known adnexal mass to assess for malignancy, but our review suggests the latter may have superior performance. We propose that more research should be conducted to support our hypothesis that SR should be preferred over LR2 for adnexal mass sonography.

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 64(S1)
Georgetown University (US), George Washington University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

OP06.06: LR2 versus simple rules: a meta‐analysis comparing the performance of ACOG‐recommended tools for differentiating adnexal masses — B. Cronquist, G. Ghanadan · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS