OC21.02: *Endometrial assessment on ultrasound: why transvaginal scan alone is not good enough?

To evaluate the proportion of suboptimal assessments of endometrial thickness (ET) on transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) in women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) and assess the efficacy of multimodal (MM) sonographic approach to ET measurement. This was a prospective observational study of consecutive women aged ≧45 years with AUB who underwent TVS assessment of ET between June-November 2022. If the endometrium could not be adequately visualised and measured on TVS using the double-layer measurement technique another method of endometrial assessment was immediately offered, including transabdominal, transrectal scan or saline infusion sonography. The relationship between TVS and MM ultrasound approach and quality of ET was assessed in both uni- and multivariate analysis models against clinical and demographic variables. A total of 387 women who initially underwent TVS to measure ET were included. In 245/387 (63%) ET measurement was optimal on TVS. However, ET assessment was suboptimal in the remaining 142/387 (37%) cases on TVS alone, which was successful in 118/142 (83%). The most common reason for suboptimal TVS was: adenomyosis 64/142 (45%), suboptimal angle 64/142 (45%) and submucosal fibroids 40/142 (28%). Median angle in suboptimal TVS cases was 33° [IQR 15,52], whereas with MM approach a median angle of 86° [IQR 78,90], (P < 0.0001) was reached to achieve optimal ET assessment. When TVS assessment was suboptimal, it was more likely to significantly overestimate ET by 1.26mm compared to MM approach (P < 0.0001). MM approach was more likely to result in optimal ET assessment in in patients of black ethnicity [OR 1.56 (95%CI 0.81 to 16.04) (P = 0.04)] or with adenomyosis [OR 1.17 (95% CI 0.3503 to 3.812) (P = 0.04)]. MM approach is a more effective way to assess ET than TVS alone in women presenting with AUB. MM approach is associated with a higher proportion of optimal ET assessment and significantly lower ET measurements, which could lead to reduction in unnecessary invasive interventions such as hysteroscopy or endometrial biopsy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.27869
Primary Topic
Gynecological conditions and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OC21.02: *Endometrial assessment on ultrasound: why transvaginal scan alone is not good enough?

Albulena Bajrami, Simrit Nijjar, D. Jurkovic, Martin Widschwendter et al.
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Gynecological conditions and treatments
article

OC21.02: *Endometrial assessment on ultrasound: why transvaginal scan alone is not good enough?

Albulena Bajrami, Simrit Nijjar, D. Jurkovic, Martin Widschwendter, Stavroula Kastora
article en

Abstract

To evaluate the proportion of suboptimal assessments of endometrial thickness (ET) on transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) in women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) and assess the efficacy of multimodal (MM) sonographic approach to ET measurement. This was a prospective observational study of consecutive women aged ≧45 years with AUB who underwent TVS assessment of ET between June-November 2022. If the endometrium could not be adequately visualised and measured on TVS using the double-layer measurement technique another method of endometrial assessment was immediately offered, including transabdominal, transrectal scan or saline infusion sonography. The relationship between TVS and MM ultrasound approach and quality of ET was assessed in both uni- and multivariate analysis models against clinical and demographic variables. A total of 387 women who initially underwent TVS to measure ET were included. In 245/387 (63%) ET measurement was optimal on TVS. However, ET assessment was suboptimal in the remaining 142/387 (37%) cases on TVS alone, which was successful in 118/142 (83%). The most common reason for suboptimal TVS was: adenomyosis 64/142 (45%), suboptimal angle 64/142 (45%) and submucosal fibroids 40/142 (28%). Median angle in suboptimal TVS cases was 33° [IQR 15,52], whereas with MM approach a median angle of 86° [IQR 78,90], (P < 0.0001) was reached to achieve optimal ET assessment. When TVS assessment was suboptimal, it was more likely to significantly overestimate ET by 1.26mm compared to MM approach (P < 0.0001). MM approach was more likely to result in optimal ET assessment in in patients of black ethnicity [OR 1.56 (95%CI 0.81 to 16.04) (P = 0.04)] or with adenomyosis [OR 1.17 (95% CI 0.3503 to 3.812) (P = 0.04)]. MM approach is a more effective way to assess ET than TVS alone in women presenting with AUB. MM approach is associated with a higher proportion of optimal ET assessment and significantly lower ET measurements, which could lead to reduction in unnecessary invasive interventions such as hysteroscopy or endometrial biopsy.

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 64(S1)
University College London (GB)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Gynecological conditions and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.