Challenges and Future Directions for Promoting Intersectional Quantitative Studies in Physical Activity Research

Understanding health inequalities is essential for improving social justice. Intersectionality refers to a theoretical framework for studying the intersection of multiple social categorizations that create unique experiences and related social inequalities. Currently, the majority of the intersectional studies in the physical activity field have a qualitative design; thus, there is a need for quantitative intersectional studies. This commentary aims to explore primary obstacles impeding intersectional quantitative research and provide recommendations for overcoming these obstacles in physical activity research. In the commentary, we discuss that the lack of accessibility of large-scale and diverse data sets, and suboptimal social categorizations and intersectionality-related questions may contribute to the scarcity of intersectional quantitative research in the field. To facilitate intersectional quantitative analyses, we advocate for making large-scale data sets accessible for intersectional secondary analyses, diverse sampling, standardizing questions and categories related to intersectionality, promoting inclusive research designs and methods, and using the appropriate questions and social categorization that reflect the distinct experiences of each subgroup. By addressing these challenges, researchers may gain new insights into health disparities, making physical activity research more inclusive and contributing to more equitable health outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Physical Activity and Health
Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2024-0480
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges and Future Directions for Promoting Intersectional Quantitative Studies in Physical Activity Research

Mari Sone, Mai J. M. Chinapaw, Teatske M. Altenburg
6 citations
Journal of Physical Activity and Health
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
3.26
article

Challenges and Future Directions for Promoting Intersectional Quantitative Studies in Physical Activity Research

Mari Sone, Mai J. M. Chinapaw, Teatske M. Altenburg
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Understanding health inequalities is essential for improving social justice. Intersectionality refers to a theoretical framework for studying the intersection of multiple social categorizations that create unique experiences and related social inequalities. Currently, the majority of the intersectional studies in the physical activity field have a qualitative design; thus, there is a need for quantitative intersectional studies. This commentary aims to explore primary obstacles impeding intersectional quantitative research and provide recommendations for overcoming these obstacles in physical activity research. In the commentary, we discuss that the lack of accessibility of large-scale and diverse data sets, and suboptimal social categorizations and intersectionality-related questions may contribute to the scarcity of intersectional quantitative research in the field. To facilitate intersectional quantitative analyses, we advocate for making large-scale data sets accessible for intersectional secondary analyses, diverse sampling, standardizing questions and categories related to intersectionality, promoting inclusive research designs and methods, and using the appropriate questions and social categorization that reflect the distinct experiences of each subgroup. By addressing these challenges, researchers may gain new insights into health disparities, making physical activity research more inclusive and contributing to more equitable health outcomes.

Journal of Physical Activity and HealthVol. 21(12)
GGD Amsterdam (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
European Commission, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
3.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.