Is Deep Learning a Better Option than Random Forest for Encrypted Traffic Classification?

Our study challenges the conventional understanding that deep learning models consistently outperform traditional machine learning approaches in classification tasks. By evaluating the performance of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Random Forest (RF) models on QUIC traffic classification, we demonstrate that RF achieves superior accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and computational efficiency compared to CNN and LSTM. This finding underscores the importance of considering both performance and computational efficiency when selecting an appropriate model. Additionally, we emphasize the practical applicability of RF, especially in resource-constrained environments, where its efficiency makes it a compelling alternative to deep learning methods. These insights offer valuable guidance for enhancing network security, optimizing resource utilization, and deploying effective traffic classification systems in real-world scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/lcn60385.2024.10639771
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Deep Learning a Better Option than Random Forest for Encrypted Traffic Classification?

Ahmed Mehaoua, Osman Salem, Quoc Bao Vo, Philippe Ea
2 citations
Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
0.69
article

Is Deep Learning a Better Option than Random Forest for Encrypted Traffic Classification?

Ahmed Mehaoua, Osman Salem, Quoc Bao Vo, Philippe Ea
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Our study challenges the conventional understanding that deep learning models consistently outperform traditional machine learning approaches in classification tasks. By evaluating the performance of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Random Forest (RF) models on QUIC traffic classification, we demonstrate that RF achieves superior accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and computational efficiency compared to CNN and LSTM. This finding underscores the importance of considering both performance and computational efficiency when selecting an appropriate model. Additionally, we emphasize the practical applicability of RF, especially in resource-constrained environments, where its efficiency makes it a compelling alternative to deep learning methods. These insights offer valuable guidance for enhancing network security, optimizing resource utilization, and deploying effective traffic classification systems in real-world scenarios.

Centre Borelli (FR)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.