Special measures to promote supplementary professional education services: formation and evaluation of effectiveness

Introduction. The problem of promotion of supplementary professional education services is one of the important issues for attracting consumers of professional retraining and advanced development programmes, contributing to marketing attainments and a company’s efficiency in general. The solution largely depends on the developmental level of the market of supplementary professional education services at a regional level, the specifics and quality of training courses, as well as the relevance of promotion tools used by the organisation. Purpose of the research: development and approbation of the methodology for forming and evaluating the effectiveness of a special tool for the promotion of supplementary professional education services. Materials and methods. To determine the format of a special survey, an online questioning of 1,035 potential consumers was carried out; ten marketing and advertising experts were interviewed and selected by the Delphi method modified by J. Fowles; a questioning of 319 participants and 20 organisers of the special survey was undertaken. The expert judgement was arranged using the Hierarchy Analysis Method by T. Saati, including the processing of the data obtained in the course of the experts interviewing and the calculation of eigenvectors of the pairwise comparison matrix. Results. A methodology for forming and evaluating the effectiveness of a special survey was developed. As a result of the approbation, eleven qualitative indicators were evaluated, scoring 7.92 out of nine, totalling 88%. The quantitative indicators, particularly, the engagement index was 56.8%; the key performance indicator was 8.5% and the return on investment was 336.8%. As a result of the special survey, 27 participants acquired the Internet marketing course. Conclusion. The proposed methodology can extend the opportunities of organisations providing supplementary special education services in terms of selecting, planning and realisation of efficient promotion tools. The methodology can be applied to the formation and evaluation of different-format special surveys with regard to their specifics.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives of science and education
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2024.4.45
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Special measures to promote supplementary professional education services: formation and evaluation of effectiveness

Olesya A. Zozulya, Valeria A. Nazarkina
Perspectives of science and education
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
article

Special measures to promote supplementary professional education services: formation and evaluation of effectiveness

Olesya A. Zozulya, Valeria A. Nazarkina
article en

Abstract

Introduction. The problem of promotion of supplementary professional education services is one of the important issues for attracting consumers of professional retraining and advanced development programmes, contributing to marketing attainments and a company’s efficiency in general. The solution largely depends on the developmental level of the market of supplementary professional education services at a regional level, the specifics and quality of training courses, as well as the relevance of promotion tools used by the organisation. Purpose of the research: development and approbation of the methodology for forming and evaluating the effectiveness of a special tool for the promotion of supplementary professional education services. Materials and methods. To determine the format of a special survey, an online questioning of 1,035 potential consumers was carried out; ten marketing and advertising experts were interviewed and selected by the Delphi method modified by J. Fowles; a questioning of 319 participants and 20 organisers of the special survey was undertaken. The expert judgement was arranged using the Hierarchy Analysis Method by T. Saati, including the processing of the data obtained in the course of the experts interviewing and the calculation of eigenvectors of the pairwise comparison matrix. Results. A methodology for forming and evaluating the effectiveness of a special survey was developed. As a result of the approbation, eleven qualitative indicators were evaluated, scoring 7.92 out of nine, totalling 88%. The quantitative indicators, particularly, the engagement index was 56.8%; the key performance indicator was 8.5% and the return on investment was 336.8%. As a result of the special survey, 27 participants acquired the Internet marketing course. Conclusion. The proposed methodology can extend the opportunities of organisations providing supplementary special education services in terms of selecting, planning and realisation of efficient promotion tools. The methodology can be applied to the formation and evaluation of different-format special surveys with regard to their specifics.

Perspectives of science and educationVol. 70(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.