Comparative Analysis of FaceNet, VGGFace, and GhostFaceNets Face Recognition Algorithms For Potential Criminal Suspect Identification

The escalating concerns surrounding criminal activities underscore the imperative for bolstered security measures to safeguard public welfare. Despite concerted efforts, the identification of suspects remains fraught with limitations, hindering the attainment of comprehensive individual profiles. Leveraging advancements in facial detection and identification technologies, this study assesses the efficacy of three prominent deep learning models—FaceNet, VGGFace, and GhostFaceNets—in the domain of facial recognition for suspect identification. Drawing upon data collected in 2023, the investigation scrutinizes FaceNet's intricate methodologies, including triplet loss optimization and Euclidean space mappings, yielding exceptional accuracy rates of 97.05% during validation and 97.4% during testing. Conversely, VGGFace, while displaying commendable accuracies, registers marginally lower accuracy metrics, standing at 97.05% and 96.1% during validation and testing, respectively. GhostFaceNets, integrating novel architectural components, exhibit diminished accuracy rates, signaling avenues for refinement. These empirical insights underscore FaceNet's prowess in furnishing robust and reliable facial recognition outcomes, while delineating the imperative for iterative enhancements in GhostFaceNets to foster their pragmatic applicability in security domains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence
Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48185/jaai.v5i2.1237
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Biometric Identification and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of FaceNet, VGGFace, and GhostFaceNets Face Recognition Algorithms For Potential Criminal Suspect Identification

Muhammad Indra Ardiawan, Gede Putra Kusuma Negarara
4 citations
Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence
Biometric Identification and Security
1.40
article

Comparative Analysis of FaceNet, VGGFace, and GhostFaceNets Face Recognition Algorithms For Potential Criminal Suspect Identification

Muhammad Indra Ardiawan, Gede Putra Kusuma Negarara
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The escalating concerns surrounding criminal activities underscore the imperative for bolstered security measures to safeguard public welfare. Despite concerted efforts, the identification of suspects remains fraught with limitations, hindering the attainment of comprehensive individual profiles. Leveraging advancements in facial detection and identification technologies, this study assesses the efficacy of three prominent deep learning models—FaceNet, VGGFace, and GhostFaceNets—in the domain of facial recognition for suspect identification. Drawing upon data collected in 2023, the investigation scrutinizes FaceNet's intricate methodologies, including triplet loss optimization and Euclidean space mappings, yielding exceptional accuracy rates of 97.05% during validation and 97.4% during testing. Conversely, VGGFace, while displaying commendable accuracies, registers marginally lower accuracy metrics, standing at 97.05% and 96.1% during validation and testing, respectively. GhostFaceNets, integrating novel architectural components, exhibit diminished accuracy rates, signaling avenues for refinement. These empirical insights underscore FaceNet's prowess in furnishing robust and reliable facial recognition outcomes, while delineating the imperative for iterative enhancements in GhostFaceNets to foster their pragmatic applicability in security domains.

Journal of Applied Artificial IntelligenceVol. 5(2)
Binus University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Biometric Identification and Security
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.