Measuring the value of teachers from traditional certification pathways in Texas: A comprehensive study

While teacher preparation in the United States continues a long period of decline, the largest-producing state, Texas, is experiencing substantial changes in how it prepares teachers. The number of teachers prepared by traditional university pathways continues to decline, and the number from alternative pathways is rising. Using extensive data from Texas, we find that traditionally prepared teachers from universities obtain significantly higher student learning gains than alternatives. We use value-added models to estimate changes in student test scores in many grade levels and test subjects as a function of teacher preparation pathway. We compare all Traditional programs to all Alternative programs, and we compare all For-Profit programs to all Not for-Profit programs. For most subjects and grade levels, students learn significantly more from Traditional or Not for-Profit program teachers: 0.02 to 0.05 in standard deviation units. There is not one significant estimate in any model where students learn more from Alternative and For-Profit programs teachers than they do from Traditional and Not For-Profit program teachers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Policy Analysis Archives
Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.32.8556
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring the value of teachers from traditional certification pathways in Texas: A comprehensive study

Michael P Marder, Annelies Rhodes
3 citations
Education Policy Analysis Archives
Student Assessment and Feedback
6.29
article

Measuring the value of teachers from traditional certification pathways in Texas: A comprehensive study

Michael P Marder, Annelies Rhodes
article en
3 citations

Abstract

While teacher preparation in the United States continues a long period of decline, the largest-producing state, Texas, is experiencing substantial changes in how it prepares teachers. The number of teachers prepared by traditional university pathways continues to decline, and the number from alternative pathways is rising. Using extensive data from Texas, we find that traditionally prepared teachers from universities obtain significantly higher student learning gains than alternatives. We use value-added models to estimate changes in student test scores in many grade levels and test subjects as a function of teacher preparation pathway. We compare all Traditional programs to all Alternative programs, and we compare all For-Profit programs to all Not for-Profit programs. For most subjects and grade levels, students learn significantly more from Traditional or Not for-Profit program teachers: 0.02 to 0.05 in standard deviation units. There is not one significant estimate in any model where students learn more from Alternative and For-Profit programs teachers than they do from Traditional and Not For-Profit program teachers.

Education Policy Analysis ArchivesVol. 32
E3 Alliance (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Student Assessment and Feedback
6.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Measuring the value of teachers from traditional certification pathways in Texas: A comprehensive study — Michael P Marder, Annelies Rhodes · Education Policy Analysis Archives (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS