I see artifacts: ICA-based EEG artifact removal does not improve deep network decoding across three BCI tasks

<i>Objective.</i>In this paper, we conduct a detailed investigation on the effect of independent component (IC)-based noise rejection methods in neural network classifier-based decoding of electroencephalography (EEG) data in different task datasets.<i>Approach.</i>We apply a pipeline matrix of two popular different independent component (IC) decomposition methods (Infomax and Adaptive Mixture Independent Component Analysis (AMICA)) with three different component rejection strategies (none, ICLabel, and multiple artifact rejection algorithm [MARA]) on three different EEG datasets (motor imagery, long-term memory formation, and visual memory). We cross-validate processed data from each pipeline with three architectures commonly used for EEG classification (two convolutional neural networks and one long short-term memory-based model. We compare decoding performances on within-participant and within-dataset levels.<i>Main Results.</i>Our results show that the benefit from using IC-based noise rejection for decoding analyses is at best minor, as component-rejected data did not show consistently better performance than data without rejections-especially given the significant computational resources required for independent component analysis (ICA) computations.<i>Significance.</i>With ever-growing emphasis on transparency and reproducibility, as well as the obvious benefits arising from streamlined processing of large-scale datasets, there has been an increased interest in automated methods for pre-processing EEG data. One prominent part of such pre-processing pipelines consists of identifying and potentially removing artifacts arising from extraneous sources. This is typically done via IC-based correction for which numerous methods have been proposed, differing not only in the decomposition of the raw data into ICs, but also in how they reject the computed ICs. While the benefits of these methods are well established in univariate statistical analyses, it is unclear whether they help in multivariate scenarios, and specifically in neural network-based decoding studies. As computational costs for pre-processing large-scale datasets are considerable, it is important to consider whether the trade-off between model performance and available resources is worth the effort.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ad788e
Citations
6
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

I see artifacts: ICA-based EEG artifact removal does not improve deep network decoding across three BCI tasks

Christian Wallraven, Yiyu Chen, Taeho Kang
6 citations
Journal of Neural Engineering
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
2.06
article

I see artifacts: ICA-based EEG artifact removal does not improve deep network decoding across three BCI tasks

Christian Wallraven, Yiyu Chen, Taeho Kang
article en
6 citations

Abstract

<i>Objective.</i>In this paper, we conduct a detailed investigation on the effect of independent component (IC)-based noise rejection methods in neural network classifier-based decoding of electroencephalography (EEG) data in different task datasets.<i>Approach.</i>We apply a pipeline matrix of two popular different independent component (IC) decomposition methods (Infomax and Adaptive Mixture Independent Component Analysis (AMICA)) with three different component rejection strategies (none, ICLabel, and multiple artifact rejection algorithm [MARA]) on three different EEG datasets (motor imagery, long-term memory formation, and visual memory). We cross-validate processed data from each pipeline with three architectures commonly used for EEG classification (two convolutional neural networks and one long short-term memory-based model. We compare decoding performances on within-participant and within-dataset levels.<i>Main Results.</i>Our results show that the benefit from using IC-based noise rejection for decoding analyses is at best minor, as component-rejected data did not show consistently better performance than data without rejections-especially given the significant computational resources required for independent component analysis (ICA) computations.<i>Significance.</i>With ever-growing emphasis on transparency and reproducibility, as well as the obvious benefits arising from streamlined processing of large-scale datasets, there has been an increased interest in automated methods for pre-processing EEG data. One prominent part of such pre-processing pipelines consists of identifying and potentially removing artifacts arising from extraneous sources. This is typically done via IC-based correction for which numerous methods have been proposed, differing not only in the decomposition of the raw data into ICs, but also in how they reject the computed ICs. While the benefits of these methods are well established in univariate statistical analyses, it is unclear whether they help in multivariate scenarios, and specifically in neural network-based decoding studies. As computational costs for pre-processing large-scale datasets are considerable, it is important to consider whether the trade-off between model performance and available resources is worth the effort.

Journal of Neural EngineeringVol. 21(6)
University of Applied Sciences Technikum Wien (AT), Korea University (KR), Center for Art Studies (KR), Korea University (JP)
Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
2.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.