Towards more sustainable and inclusive development corridors in Africa

Abstract Development corridors are linear programmes of infrastructure and agriculture aiming to facilitate rapid socio-economic development. In Africa, they are a major development activity, with 88 underway or planned corridors. Drawing from extensive literature and insights gleaned from a 4 year research programme, this review scrutinizes the impacts of development corridors on people, wildlife and ecosystems in Kenya and Tanzania, proposing solutions to achieve better outcomes. The overarching goal was to discern the principle challenges emerging from the practical execution of the prevailing corridor model. The holistic approach taken, assessing the development corridors paradigm through an integrated ecological, social, and economic lens, provides novel insights that have not been possible using more traditional—siloed—research approaches. Eight key challenge areas are identified: impact assessments processes; coherence across international, national and local planning; governance; inclusivity; equality; impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services; incorporation of future climate risks; and integrated water resource management. Poorly planned and implemented corridors detrimentally impact livelihoods and ecosystems. They lack a sustainable development vision, detailed social, environmental or climate risk assessments, and develop incrementally in policy and corporate spaces. There is also often a disconnect between investors and recipient governments, with some investors funding what governments request without applying internationally-recognised safeguards, and governments lacking capacity and resources to enforce regulations. We make recommendations for addressing these challenge areas. These aim to enhance impact assessment efficacy; integrate local perspectives into effective and inclusive corridor planning; overcome siloed project development and implementation; anticipate future development projections; and prioritise landscape preservation for enhanced ecosystem services and climate resilience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Infrastructure and Sustainability
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/ad7887
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Urban and Rural Development Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards more sustainable and inclusive development corridors in Africa

Lisen Runsten, Kate Elizabeth Gannon, Amayaa Wijesinghe, Han Meng et al.
5 citations
Environmental Research Infrastructure and Sustainability
Urban and Rural Development Challenges
9.79
article

Towards more sustainable and inclusive development corridors in Africa

Lisen Runsten, Kate Elizabeth Gannon, Amayaa Wijesinghe, Han Meng, Japhet J. Kashaigili, Chris Sandbrook, Camilla Blasi Foglietti, Daniel Olago, Pantaleo Munishi, Paulo Lyimo, Arnout van Soesbergen, Tanya Payne, Joseph W. Bull, Catherine Sang, Nyemo A. Chilagane, Rob Marchant, Molly Brown, Declan Conway, Ayesha S. Hargey, Lucy Waruingi, Diego Juffe‐Bignoli, Neil M. Burgess, Jessica Thorn, Yinlong Xu, Christine Tam, Julia Wentworth, Hamza Butt, Gediminas Lesutis, Aisha Niazi, Rowan Palmer
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Development corridors are linear programmes of infrastructure and agriculture aiming to facilitate rapid socio-economic development. In Africa, they are a major development activity, with 88 underway or planned corridors. Drawing from extensive literature and insights gleaned from a 4 year research programme, this review scrutinizes the impacts of development corridors on people, wildlife and ecosystems in Kenya and Tanzania, proposing solutions to achieve better outcomes. The overarching goal was to discern the principle challenges emerging from the practical execution of the prevailing corridor model. The holistic approach taken, assessing the development corridors paradigm through an integrated ecological, social, and economic lens, provides novel insights that have not been possible using more traditional—siloed—research approaches. Eight key challenge areas are identified: impact assessments processes; coherence across international, national and local planning; governance; inclusivity; equality; impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services; incorporation of future climate risks; and integrated water resource management. Poorly planned and implemented corridors detrimentally impact livelihoods and ecosystems. They lack a sustainable development vision, detailed social, environmental or climate risk assessments, and develop incrementally in policy and corporate spaces. There is also often a disconnect between investors and recipient governments, with some investors funding what governments request without applying internationally-recognised safeguards, and governments lacking capacity and resources to enforce regulations. We make recommendations for addressing these challenge areas. These aim to enhance impact assessment efficacy; integrate local perspectives into effective and inclusive corridor planning; overcome siloed project development and implementation; anticipate future development projections; and prioritise landscape preservation for enhanced ecosystem services and climate resilience.

Environmental Research Infrastructure and SustainabilityVol. 4(3)
Institute for Biodiversity (DE)
UK Research and Innovation, Global Challenges Research Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Urban and Rural Development Challenges
9.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.