Biomapping and Enviromapping of Microbial Indicators and Pathogens in a Commercial Beef Processing Facility

The study aimed to perform biomapping and enviromapping of microbial indicators and pathogens to track microbial changes on carcasses and various surfaces throughout the facility, from harvest to fabrication. Additionally, the study sought to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions and food safety programs in 3 distinct areas of the facility. Samples were collected on 2 separate days to track the fabrication of carcasses from cattle harvested the previous day. On the first day, samples were taken from the lairage area and the harvest floor. On the second day, samples were collected from the fabrication floor. The surfaces tested included walls, equipment, handrails, drains, conveyor belts, cutting boards, and carcasses. MicroTally® cloths (FREMONTA), EZ Reach™ sponges (World Bioproducts), and boot covers (VWR® Basic Protection Anti-Skid Shoe cover, Avantor) were used to collect samples depending on the surface. Most samples, except those from the lairage area, were enumerated using the TEMPO® system (bioMérieux). All samples were tested for pathogens using the BAX® System (Hygiena). The microbial indicators for this study were aerobic counts, Enterobacteriaceae, and Escherichia coli Biotype I, and for pathogens were Escherichia coli O157:H7 (Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli [STEC] O157), non-O157 STEC (O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, and O145), and Salmonella spp. As anticipated, statistical reductions among different areas occurred for all 3 locations (P<0.05). The results showed a trend of decreasing microbial loads, starting with high levels of indicators and gradually reducing in the later stages of the process. Salmonella and STEC were detected in the lairage and harvest areas, with some also found on surfaces in the fabrication area before the final interventions were applied. Biomapping and enviromapping are valuable tools for assessing the efficacy of interventions and the effectiveness of food safety programs, enabling manufacturers to make data-driven decisions.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Meat and Muscle Biology
Published
2024-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22175/mmb.18188
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biomapping and Enviromapping of Microbial Indicators and Pathogens in a Commercial Beef Processing Facility

Meat and Muscle Biology
Intellectual Property Law
article

Biomapping and Enviromapping of Microbial Indicators and Pathogens in a Commercial Beef Processing Facility

article en

Abstract

The study aimed to perform biomapping and enviromapping of microbial indicators and pathogens to track microbial changes on carcasses and various surfaces throughout the facility, from harvest to fabrication. Additionally, the study sought to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions and food safety programs in 3 distinct areas of the facility. Samples were collected on 2 separate days to track the fabrication of carcasses from cattle harvested the previous day. On the first day, samples were taken from the lairage area and the harvest floor. On the second day, samples were collected from the fabrication floor. The surfaces tested included walls, equipment, handrails, drains, conveyor belts, cutting boards, and carcasses. MicroTally® cloths (FREMONTA), EZ Reach™ sponges (World Bioproducts), and boot covers (VWR® Basic Protection Anti-Skid Shoe cover, Avantor) were used to collect samples depending on the surface. Most samples, except those from the lairage area, were enumerated using the TEMPO® system (bioMérieux). All samples were tested for pathogens using the BAX® System (Hygiena). The microbial indicators for this study were aerobic counts, Enterobacteriaceae, and Escherichia coli Biotype I, and for pathogens were Escherichia coli O157:H7 (Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli [STEC] O157), non-O157 STEC (O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, and O145), and Salmonella spp. As anticipated, statistical reductions among different areas occurred for all 3 locations (P<0.05). The results showed a trend of decreasing microbial loads, starting with high levels of indicators and gradually reducing in the later stages of the process. Salmonella and STEC were detected in the lairage and harvest areas, with some also found on surfaces in the fabrication area before the final interventions were applied. Biomapping and enviromapping are valuable tools for assessing the efficacy of interventions and the effectiveness of food safety programs, enabling manufacturers to make data-driven decisions.

Meat and Muscle BiologyVol. 9(1)
Texas Tech University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Intellectual Property Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.