Effect of Support on Iron-Based Catalyst Toward CO2-Free H2 Production From Methane Pyrolysis

The global demand for low-emission hydrogen production is increasing rapidly due to the potential for hydrogen to substitute conventional fossil fuels in energy-related applications. Among practical technologies such as steam reforming of methane (SMR), water electrolysis, and methane pyrolysis, methane pyrolysis has the most potential to produce economical- and near-zero-emission hydrogen. The reaction during methane pyrolysis produces a solid carbon by-product that can be monetized to offset production costs. However, this route is not without research challenges, and the selective formation of high-value carbon remains a critical issue. Supported nickel, iron, and cobalt, have been widely investigated for methane pyrolysis. Although iron-based catalysts are less active than Ni, iron catalysts offer less resistance to coke formation, are inexpensive, and have a longer lifetime. One area not sufficiently explored is the effect of support materials other than Al2O3 for the iron-based catalysts. Therefore, we investigated a detailed variation of support materials to study their influence on the catalytic performance. Moreover, this study offers a fair and direct comparison among all catalytic materials which were synthesized and studied under identical conditions. This direct comparison of the obtained results is important because results reported in different publications are often not comparable due to very different reaction conditions.