Are There any Differences in the Outcome of Non-valvular AF Patients with Moderate CKD, Taking Rivaroxaban or Warfarin?

Background: Warfarin has long been a reliable anticoagulant, prized for its affordability and extensive track record. However, with advancements in anticoagulant therapies, many uses of warfarin have been replaced by Novel Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) agents. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common heart rhythm disorder, affecting approximately 3% of the population. This arrhythmia significantly increases the risk of both morbidity and mortality, with the risk of ischemic stroke being five times higher compared to those without AF. The outcomes for patients with different comorbidities may vary when treated with either Rivaroxaban or Warfarin. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate renal function outcomes in AF patients with moderate chronic kidney disease (CKD) who are treated with either Warfarin or Rivaroxaban. Methods: This prospective cohort study involved 99 patients recently diagnosed with non-valvular AF (< 1 year) and moderate CKD, who were treated with either Warfarin or Rivaroxaban. These patients were followed for one year after their initial presentation to our center. Laboratory data and other relevant documents were collected at each visit until the conclusion of the study year. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 27, with chi-square tests and t-tests applied as appropriate. Results: The study included two groups: 25 patients on Warfarin and 74 patients on Rivaroxaban. Gender and other demographic factors were evenly distributed between the two groups. The mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in the Rivaroxaban group improved non-significantly at 6 and 12 months, whereas a slight, non-significant decrease in GFR was observed in the Warfarin group. Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurred in 2 patients in the Rivaroxaban group. Gastrointestinal bleeding was reported in 5 patients, with incidents evenly distributed between the two groups. Conclusions: There was no significant difference in renal outcomes between patients with newly diagnosed non-valvular AF (< 1 year) with moderate CKD treated with Warfarin or Rivaroxaban. However, for women with hypertension or high-risk thrombosis, Rivaroxaban may be associated with better renal outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Annals
Published
2024-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5812/mca-141645
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are There any Differences in the Outcome of Non-valvular AF Patients with Moderate CKD, Taking Rivaroxaban or Warfarin?

Zahra Gholami Mahmoudian, Hamid Reza Pasha, Mahdi Khalili, Shabnam Boudagh et al.
Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Annals
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Are There any Differences in the Outcome of Non-valvular AF Patients with Moderate CKD, Taking Rivaroxaban or Warfarin?

Zahra Gholami Mahmoudian, Hamid Reza Pasha, Mahdi Khalili, Shabnam Boudagh, Mona Heidarali, Saeed Ebrahimi Meimand, Fatemeh Bayat, Saeed Dalouchi
article en

Abstract

Background: Warfarin has long been a reliable anticoagulant, prized for its affordability and extensive track record. However, with advancements in anticoagulant therapies, many uses of warfarin have been replaced by Novel Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) agents. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common heart rhythm disorder, affecting approximately 3% of the population. This arrhythmia significantly increases the risk of both morbidity and mortality, with the risk of ischemic stroke being five times higher compared to those without AF. The outcomes for patients with different comorbidities may vary when treated with either Rivaroxaban or Warfarin. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate renal function outcomes in AF patients with moderate chronic kidney disease (CKD) who are treated with either Warfarin or Rivaroxaban. Methods: This prospective cohort study involved 99 patients recently diagnosed with non-valvular AF (< 1 year) and moderate CKD, who were treated with either Warfarin or Rivaroxaban. These patients were followed for one year after their initial presentation to our center. Laboratory data and other relevant documents were collected at each visit until the conclusion of the study year. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 27, with chi-square tests and t-tests applied as appropriate. Results: The study included two groups: 25 patients on Warfarin and 74 patients on Rivaroxaban. Gender and other demographic factors were evenly distributed between the two groups. The mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in the Rivaroxaban group improved non-significantly at 6 and 12 months, whereas a slight, non-significant decrease in GFR was observed in the Warfarin group. Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurred in 2 patients in the Rivaroxaban group. Gastrointestinal bleeding was reported in 5 patients, with incidents evenly distributed between the two groups. Conclusions: There was no significant difference in renal outcomes between patients with newly diagnosed non-valvular AF (< 1 year) with moderate CKD treated with Warfarin or Rivaroxaban. However, for women with hypertension or high-risk thrombosis, Rivaroxaban may be associated with better renal outcomes.

Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular AnnalsVol. 15(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.