Dihydrorhodamine-123 flow cytometry method: time for substantial revision in technical procedure

The dihydrorhodamine 123 assay is generally applied to measure the production of intracellular reactive oxygen species in neutrophils using flow cytometry and is considered a diagnostic evaluation for chronic granulomatous disease. In fact, there is a broad range of variables that can directly or indirectly affect test results, either individually or collectively. It is therefore crucial to identify the ideal requirements to achieve reliable results as well as using these requirements to provide standard operating procedures that should be taken into account. Therefore, we focus on aligning optimum results by comparing preanalytical and analytical phases that influence test results, such as the effect of various anticoagulants, transport and maintaining temperature (24°C or 4°C) of samples, test prime run time, appropriate solution concentrations, and effect of incubation temperature (24°C or 37°C) during the test run.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Laboratory Medicine
Published
2024-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmae076
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dihydrorhodamine-123 flow cytometry method: time for substantial revision in technical procedure

Amir Hossein Poopak, Gelareh Khosravipour, Hamed Baghdadi, Behzad Poopak et al.
2 citations
Laboratory Medicine
Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms
0.48
article

Dihydrorhodamine-123 flow cytometry method: time for substantial revision in technical procedure

Amir Hossein Poopak, Gelareh Khosravipour, Hamed Baghdadi, Behzad Poopak, Yousef Fatahi, Sina Zargaran, Mahdi Zavvar, Peyvand Poopak, Fariba Nabatchian
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The dihydrorhodamine 123 assay is generally applied to measure the production of intracellular reactive oxygen species in neutrophils using flow cytometry and is considered a diagnostic evaluation for chronic granulomatous disease. In fact, there is a broad range of variables that can directly or indirectly affect test results, either individually or collectively. It is therefore crucial to identify the ideal requirements to achieve reliable results as well as using these requirements to provide standard operating procedures that should be taken into account. Therefore, we focus on aligning optimum results by comparing preanalytical and analytical phases that influence test results, such as the effect of various anticoagulants, transport and maintaining temperature (24°C or 4°C) of samples, test prime run time, appropriate solution concentrations, and effect of incubation temperature (24°C or 37°C) during the test run.

Laboratory MedicineVol. 56(2)
Tarbiat Modares University (IR), University of Toronto (CA), Islamic Azad University Medical Branch of Tehran (IR), Specialty Materials (United States) (US), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms
0.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.