Performance Analysis of Routing Protocols for Urban VANET Based on SUMO and NS2.35

To make the dream of intelligent transportation systems come true, the development of the autonomous cars is considered as a tremendous disruptive innovation in the coming years. Vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) are being used as a tool for improving road safety by alarming the drivers about accidents occurred ahead of them or for providing internet access via gateways along the road. Due to highly dynamic nature of nodes in VANETs, designing a routing protocol for VANET is quite challenging compared to other networks environment. Researchers have suggested several routing algorithms for VANETs. Few routing algorithms are based on topology based whereas others have considered position based etc. As no standard scheme is available for choosing a routing protocol in VANETs, this paper gives an insight on how to choose a routing protocol depends on varying condition of traffic such as number of nodes on the roads and maximum speed of nodes. The popular protocols of Topology Based Routings and Position Based Routing have been chosen for analysis on varying traffic environment. All the protocols have been critically tested for different metrics such as packet delivery ratio and average end-to-end delay during the simulation. Simulation is carried out with the help of SUMO traffic simulator and open-source simulation tools NS2.35 network simulator. Simulation result show that Position Based Routing is performing better at low average end-to-end delay than Topology Based Routings, but Position Based Routing has the lowest possible performance in packet delivery ratio than Topology Based Routings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Vālasān vithanyāsāt mahāvithanyālai Suphānuvong.
Published
2024-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69692/sujmrd0802303
Primary Topic
Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Analysis of Routing Protocols for Urban VANET Based on SUMO and NS2.35

Chitnavanh Phonekhamma
Vālasān vithanyāsāt mahāvithanyālai Suphānuvong.
Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
article

Performance Analysis of Routing Protocols for Urban VANET Based on SUMO and NS2.35

Chitnavanh Phonekhamma
article en

Abstract

To make the dream of intelligent transportation systems come true, the development of the autonomous cars is considered as a tremendous disruptive innovation in the coming years. Vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) are being used as a tool for improving road safety by alarming the drivers about accidents occurred ahead of them or for providing internet access via gateways along the road. Due to highly dynamic nature of nodes in VANETs, designing a routing protocol for VANET is quite challenging compared to other networks environment. Researchers have suggested several routing algorithms for VANETs. Few routing algorithms are based on topology based whereas others have considered position based etc. As no standard scheme is available for choosing a routing protocol in VANETs, this paper gives an insight on how to choose a routing protocol depends on varying condition of traffic such as number of nodes on the roads and maximum speed of nodes. The popular protocols of Topology Based Routings and Position Based Routing have been chosen for analysis on varying traffic environment. All the protocols have been critically tested for different metrics such as packet delivery ratio and average end-to-end delay during the simulation. Simulation is carried out with the help of SUMO traffic simulator and open-source simulation tools NS2.35 network simulator. Simulation result show that Position Based Routing is performing better at low average end-to-end delay than Topology Based Routings, but Position Based Routing has the lowest possible performance in packet delivery ratio than Topology Based Routings.

Vālasān vithanyāsāt mahāvithanyālai Suphānuvong.Vol. 8(2)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.