An improved model accuracy for forecasting risk measures: application of ensemble methods

Statistical-based predictions with extreme value theory improve the performance of the risk model not by choosing the model structure that is expected to predict the best but by developing a model whose results are a combination of models with different shapes. Using different ensemble algorithms to conglomerate the TBATS and the GEV distribution, we found that the stacking ensemble algorithm outperforms other ensembles hence the forecasting accuracy of risk measures is improved with the stacking ensemble algorithm. The risk estimates suggest that the returns on losses averaging 0.014 and 0.018 invested at 90 and 99 percent respectively, are riskier than the returns on gains. Backtesting results further revealed that all the risk measures are reliable, and the combined model is a good one for computing financial risk particularly in South Africa. At high confidence levels, all the risk measures seem to perform better than at lower confidence levels, as evidenced by higher probability values from backtesting using the Kupiec and Christoffersen test at 95 percent than at 99 percent levels of significance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Economics
Published
2024-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2024.2395775
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An improved model accuracy for forecasting risk measures: application of ensemble methods

Katleho Makatjane, Kesaobaka Mmelesi
1 citations
Journal of Applied Economics
Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
0.54
article

An improved model accuracy for forecasting risk measures: application of ensemble methods

Katleho Makatjane, Kesaobaka Mmelesi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Statistical-based predictions with extreme value theory improve the performance of the risk model not by choosing the model structure that is expected to predict the best but by developing a model whose results are a combination of models with different shapes. Using different ensemble algorithms to conglomerate the TBATS and the GEV distribution, we found that the stacking ensemble algorithm outperforms other ensembles hence the forecasting accuracy of risk measures is improved with the stacking ensemble algorithm. The risk estimates suggest that the returns on losses averaging 0.014 and 0.018 invested at 90 and 99 percent respectively, are riskier than the returns on gains. Backtesting results further revealed that all the risk measures are reliable, and the combined model is a good one for computing financial risk particularly in South Africa. At high confidence levels, all the risk measures seem to perform better than at lower confidence levels, as evidenced by higher probability values from backtesting using the Kupiec and Christoffersen test at 95 percent than at 99 percent levels of significance.

Journal of Applied EconomicsVol. 27(1)
University of Botswana (BW), University of Johannesburg (ZA)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.