Assessing the sustainability of Blue Economy activities using an ecosystem and life cycle-based approach: Possibilities, challenges and implications for an informed policy making

The global ocean faces increasing exploitation to meet the demand of a rapidly growing globalisation. Human marine activities are leading to local environmental pressures/benefits, for example on marine ecosystems and their services, but also through their value chains on terrestrial ecosystem services, and to global pressures such as global warming. Effective management of marine activities is essential for the conservation of the natural environment. There is a growing need for holistic sustainability assessment tools capable of quantifying environmental impacts at various geographical scales, alongside evidence-informed policies. This study examines the evolving marine policy landscape, identifies key legislation that supports the sustainable growth of the Blue Economy, traces its historical development, and explores the integration of ecosystem services assessment and life cycle assessment as methodologies for assessing environmental sustainability within this legislation. The review shows that current legislation falls short in providing instructions on how to measure sustainability impacts in a consistent way, i.e., which methods/indicators to use. Therefore, this study supports evidence-informed policy-making by proposing a quantitative and comprehensive environmental sustainability impact assessment methodology, integrating both ecosystem and life-cycle based methods, to a Belgian multi-use case study involving offshore wind energy and mussel farming. Considering the impacts that were possible to assess and the limits of the methodology used, the value of the positive impacts of the MUOF was +61.3 M€ y − , while the negative ones were −4.0 M€ y −1 , resulting in a net handprint of +57.0 M€ y −1 , primarily attributed to the benefits of the local ecosystem service ‘offshore renewable energy’ However, such a solution is not necessarily scalable, due to cumulative impacts. An analysis was conducted to identify areas for enhancing the methodology to more effectively meet policy needs. The study highlights the importance of using scientifically grounded methods to inform policy decisions. • Review of life-cycle and ecosystem-based sustainability in Blue Economy legislation. • Applying a quantitative, comprehensive environmental impact assessment. • Case study of a marine multi-use offshore wind and mussel farm. • Identification of challenges to interlink science and policy. • Supporting evidence-informed marine policy making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ocean & Coastal Management
Published
2024-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107360
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Coastal and Marine Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the sustainability of Blue Economy activities using an ecosystem and life cycle-based approach: Possibilities, challenges and implications for an informed policy making

Ine Moulaert, Laura Vittoria De Luca Peña, Jo Dewulf, Johanna J. Heymans et al.
6 citations
Ocean & Coastal Management
Coastal and Marine Management
4.26
article

Assessing the sustainability of Blue Economy activities using an ecosystem and life cycle-based approach: Possibilities, challenges and implications for an informed policy making

Ine Moulaert, Laura Vittoria De Luca Peña, Jo Dewulf, Johanna J. Heymans, Sue Ellen Taelman, Jan Staes, Sara Vandamme
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The global ocean faces increasing exploitation to meet the demand of a rapidly growing globalisation. Human marine activities are leading to local environmental pressures/benefits, for example on marine ecosystems and their services, but also through their value chains on terrestrial ecosystem services, and to global pressures such as global warming. Effective management of marine activities is essential for the conservation of the natural environment. There is a growing need for holistic sustainability assessment tools capable of quantifying environmental impacts at various geographical scales, alongside evidence-informed policies. This study examines the evolving marine policy landscape, identifies key legislation that supports the sustainable growth of the Blue Economy, traces its historical development, and explores the integration of ecosystem services assessment and life cycle assessment as methodologies for assessing environmental sustainability within this legislation. The review shows that current legislation falls short in providing instructions on how to measure sustainability impacts in a consistent way, i.e., which methods/indicators to use. Therefore, this study supports evidence-informed policy-making by proposing a quantitative and comprehensive environmental sustainability impact assessment methodology, integrating both ecosystem and life-cycle based methods, to a Belgian multi-use case study involving offshore wind energy and mussel farming. Considering the impacts that were possible to assess and the limits of the methodology used, the value of the positive impacts of the MUOF was +61.3 M€ y − , while the negative ones were −4.0 M€ y −1 , resulting in a net handprint of +57.0 M€ y −1 , primarily attributed to the benefits of the local ecosystem service ‘offshore renewable energy’ However, such a solution is not necessarily scalable, due to cumulative impacts. An analysis was conducted to identify areas for enhancing the methodology to more effectively meet policy needs. The study highlights the importance of using scientifically grounded methods to inform policy decisions. • Review of life-cycle and ecosystem-based sustainability in Blue Economy legislation. • Applying a quantitative, comprehensive environmental impact assessment. • Case study of a marine multi-use offshore wind and mussel farm. • Identification of challenges to interlink science and policy. • Supporting evidence-informed marine policy making.

Ocean & Coastal ManagementVol. 257
Flanders Marine Institute (BE), University of Antwerp (BE), Ghent University (BE), Scottish Association For Marine Science (GB)
Agentschap Innoveren en Ondernemen, Vlaams Instituut voor de Zee, European Commission, Universiteit Gent, Universiteit Antwerpen, Vlaamse regering
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Coastal and Marine Management
4.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.