Decision Tree for the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recession Defects When Utilizing MCAT or MCAF Based on Evidence and Clinical Experience

The multiple coronally advanced flap (MCAF) and the modified coronally advanced tunnel technique (MCAT) are the most commonly used methods for treating multiple gingival recessions. However, treating multiple defects is very complex due to various biologic and anatomical factors, and there is no clear guideline on the major or minor determinants that influence surgical decisions. The aim of the present article is to discuss a decision tree to suggest to clinicians the most relevant anatomical factors to consider when evaluating the choice between an MCAT and an MCAF. In the proposed decision-making process, the first crucial step involves the evaluation of the interdental clinical attachment loss according to the new EFP/AAP classification. The next step is to assess the dimensions of the lateral keratinized tissue (LKT)—that is, the keratinized tissue located laterally to the recession defect. When the amount of LKT is insufficient, the interdental papillae size, including base, height, and coronal width, must also be evaluated.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry
Published
2025-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.7290
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.51
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decision Tree for the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recession Defects When Utilizing MCAT or MCAF Based on Evidence and Clinical Experience

Giovanna Laura Di Domenico, Sofia Aroca, Massimo De Sanctis, Giovanni Zucchelli
3 citations
The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
5.51
article

Decision Tree for the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recession Defects When Utilizing MCAT or MCAF Based on Evidence and Clinical Experience

Giovanna Laura Di Domenico, Sofia Aroca, Massimo De Sanctis, Giovanni Zucchelli
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The multiple coronally advanced flap (MCAF) and the modified coronally advanced tunnel technique (MCAT) are the most commonly used methods for treating multiple gingival recessions. However, treating multiple defects is very complex due to various biologic and anatomical factors, and there is no clear guideline on the major or minor determinants that influence surgical decisions. The aim of the present article is to discuss a decision tree to suggest to clinicians the most relevant anatomical factors to consider when evaluating the choice between an MCAT and an MCAF. In the proposed decision-making process, the first crucial step involves the evaluation of the interdental clinical attachment loss according to the new EFP/AAP classification. The next step is to assess the dimensions of the lateral keratinized tissue (LKT)—that is, the keratinized tissue located laterally to the recession defect. When the amount of LKT is insufficient, the interdental papillae size, including base, height, and coronal width, must also be evaluated.

The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative DentistryVol. 45(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
5.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.